V. K. JADHAV, SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE
Mahadev Asaram Sillode (C. No. 10644) Nagpur Central Prison Nagpur – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary Home Department – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
V.K. JADHAV, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, heard finally at admission stage.
2. The petitioner, who is a life convict, has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions that the life sentence imposed by the 4th Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna in Sessions Case No. 100 of 2005, confirmed by this Court in criminal appeal No. 576 of 2006 and the sentence of 10 years rigorous imprisonment imposed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 305 of 2011, to run concurrently in terms of the provisions of Section 427(2) of Cr.P.C.
Vasudeo Shankar Rajput vs. The State of Maharashtra
Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, West Bengal vs. Mohan Singh and others
Surya Dev Rai vs. Ram Chander Rai and Ors.
State of Maharashtra vs. Raju Dadaba Borge
Sundaram @ Vellian vs. The Secretary, State of T.N. Home department
State of Punjab v. Madhanlal (2009) 5 SCC 238) : (AIR 2009 SC (Supp) 2836)
Surya Dev Rai vs. Ram Chancier Raj and Others
Ranjit Singh vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh and Ors.
Pepsi Foods Ltd. and Ors vs. Special Judicial Magistrate and Ors
M.R Kuduva v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Mohd. Akhtar Hussain alias Ibrahim Ahmed Bhatti v. Assistant Collector of Customs (Prevention)
Kamalananda v. State of Tamil Nadu
Istiyak Khan Iqubal Khan vs. State of Maharashtra
Hanuman vs. State of Maharashtra
Gopal Vinayak Gotse v. State of Maharashtra
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.