SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Bom) 123

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY 
B.P.COLABAWALLA, AMIT S.JAMSANDEKAR, JJ.
M/s. JSW Steel Limited - Appellant 
Vs.
Electricity Inspector – Inspection Zone– I - Respondent 
Writ Petition No. 12477 of 2015 With Writ Petition No. 13941 of 2016 With Interim Application (ST) No. 40287 of 2025
Decided On : 02-04-2026

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Janak Dwarkadas a/w. Chirag Kamdar a/w. Vineet Unnikrishnan a/w. Ms. Sonu Bhasi a/w. Veena Hari a/w. Karthika Sanjay i/b. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Advocates
For the Respondent: Ms. Shruti D. Vyas, Additional Government Pleader a/w. Mr. M.M. Pabale, AGP, Mr. Harinder Toor i/b. M/s. Expletus Legal, Mr. Uddhav Dahiphale, Joint Secretary Energy Department – Present in Court., Mr. Sandip Patil, Chief Electrical Inspector, And Ms. Kirti Deshmukh, Deputy Director, Industries Department, Government of Maharashtra – Present In Court.

Electricity duty exemption notification linked to 'period of eligibility' in Eligibility Certificate under incentive scheme extends automatically with Certificate extension; saved by subsequent Act without need for fresh notification.

Headnote:(A) Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958 - Section 5A - Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993 - Notifications dated 29.12.1999 and 15.10.2001 - Maharashtra Electricity Duty Act, 2016 - Sections 4 (Proviso) and 16 - Exemption from electricity duty for mega projects granted to those with Eligibility Certificate under incentive scheme - Exemption explicitly for 'period of eligibility of the said project as mentioned in the Eligibility Certificate' - Extension of Eligibility Certificate validity under scheme for unavailed sales tax incentives automatically extends electricity duty exemption period - No fresh notification required under Section 5A or Section 4 of 2016 Act - Prior notifications and rights saved by proviso to Section 4 and Section 16 of 2016 Act - Exemption notifications strictly construed for eligibility, liberally for benefits once eligible - Principles of promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation apply where substantial investment made relying on state's promise. (Paras 16, 25-32, 38, 41-47)

(B) Exemption Notifications - Interpretation - Plain language linking exemption to Eligibility Certificate cannot be ignored - Distinction between 'validity period' and 'period of eligibility' rejected as contrary to scheme and affidavit admissions - State's failure to amend notification post-extension renders exemption operative till extended date. (Paras 34-38)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner, a mega project unit, obtained Eligibility Certificate under incentive scheme valid initially 14 years (6.8.1998 to 5.8.2012), extended by Addenda to 5.8.2019 for balance sales tax incentives. Notification under Section 5A exempted electricity duty for eligibility period in Certificate. State denied exemption post-2012, demanded payment including under 2016 Act; petitioner paid under protest challenging demands.

Findings of Court:
Exemption linked to Eligibility Certificate; extends to 5.8.2019. State to refund Rs.47,47,61,492/- paid since 6.8.2012 within 12 weeks.

Issues: (i) Whether notification under Section 5A linked to Eligibility Certificate? (ii) Entitlement to exemption post-2016 Act without separate notification?

Ratio Decidendi: Notification's plain language ties exemption to eligibility period in Certificate; extension for sales incentives extends exemption. No ambiguity; liberal interpretation favours beneficiary. 2016 Act saves prior notifications and rights. State's denial arbitrary, breaches promissory estoppel.

Result: Petitions allowed; declarations granted; refund ordered.

Table of Content
1. petition challenges denial of electricity duty exemption. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. exemption linked to eligibility certificate; promissory estoppel. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. strict interpretation; no automatic exemption extension. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. issues: notification linkage and post-2016 act effect. (Para 15 , 16)
5. scheme ties incentives to eligibility certificate period. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
6. notification explicitly links exemption to eligibility period. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
7. validity extension extends eligibility period. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
8. 2016 act saves prior notifications; estoppel applies. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47)
9. petition allowed; refund electricity duty paid. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51)

JUDGMENT :

(Per Amit Satyavan Jamsandekar J.):

1. By the present petitions, the Petitioner has challenged the acts and decisions of the Respondents by which the Respondents have denied the Petitioner the exemption from payment of electricity duty. It is the case of the Petitioner that the Petitioner is entitled to exemption from payment of electricity duty for the period beginning from 6th August 2012 up to 5th August 2019. This exemption from payment of electricity duty is sought by the Petitioner by virtue of Notification dated 29th December 1999 (the Notification) issued by the State of Maharashtra (the State in exercise of its powers under Section 5A of the Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958 (the BEDA, 1958).

2. Rule. The service is waived by Ms. Vyas, the Learned AGP, on behalf of the State and Mr. Toor, the Learned Counsel, on behalf of the 1st and 2nd Respondents. The pleadings in the proceedings are complete. With the consent of parties, Rule is made returnable forthwith and heard finally.

3. The above captioned two Writ Petitions are in respect of the same subject matter. However, the subsequently filed Writ Petition No.13941 of 2016 covers all subsequent facts, circumstances, and actions of the Respondents arising from their decision to deny the Petitioner the benefit of exemption from payment of electricity duty. The decision in Writ Petition No.13941 of 2016 would cover the entire subject matter in dispute. Therefore, Writ Petition No.13941 of 2016 is taken up for hearing first, by consent of the Learned Counsels appearing for the parties.

4. Before we proceed to decide the rival contentions of the parties, it would be apposite to set out the undisputed facts and the sequence of events.

i) In 1964, the State, through its Industries, Energy and Labour Department, implemented a Package of Incentive Scheme. The intention behind the scheme was to disperse industries outside the Bombay, Thane and Pune area of the State and to attract industry to the underdeveloped areas of the State. The scheme has been amended from time to time since the year 1964. The amendment, which took effect in the year 1988, was operative from 1st October 1988 to 30th September 1993. Thereafter, by its Resolution dated 7th May 1993, the State modified the said scheme and extended it with effect from 1st October 1993 (the Scheme). Under this extension, the unit holding an Eligibility Certificate issued by the implementing agency was entitled to claim the facilities in accordance with the guidelines laid down therein. The Scheme was further amended by the State by its Resolution dated 20th June 1997. As per the said Resolution, the projects having a fixed capital investment of a minimum of Rs. 1000 Crores were called ‘Mega Projects’. By this amendment, ‘Mega Projects’ were held to be eligible to avail certain incentives for a period of 14 years, with the option to extend the said period for a further seven years. It is undisputed that the Petitioner was eligible as a ‘Mega Unit’. Therefore, it applied under the Scheme and on 3rd August 1998, and an Eligibility Certificate under the Scheme was issued to the Petitioner. The validity of the E


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top