ARAVIND KUMAR, ASHUTOSH SHASTRI
Alembic Limited – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Ashutosh Shastri, J.)
1. Both these letters patent appeals are arising out of a common CAV Judgement dated 24.08.2016 passed by the learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No.2683 of 2004 with Special Civil Application No.8320 of 2009. Since facts in both the appeals are common and parties are also the same, the learned advocates appearing for both the sides have requested to take up the hearing of both these letters patent appeals conjointly. Considering their request and in view of similarity of grievance, we deem it proper to hear and dispose of these appeals by the present common order.
2. Since the grievance arising out of these proceedings is identical, for the sake of convenience, we have treated Letters Patent Appeal No.1068 of 2016 as the lead matter and facts are taken from said appeal.
3. Insofar as Letters Patent Appeal No.1068 of 2016 is concerned, same is related to Special Civil Application No.8320 of 2009, in which, appellants-original petitioners challenged the legality and validity of the decision taken by respondent No.2 dated 17.06.2008 and sought refund of the amount paid, and to be precise, the relief clause contained in the petition is re
Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat vs. Favourite Industries
S. Sundaram Pillai & Ors. vs. V.R. Pattarbiraman & Ors. (1985) 1 SCC 591
Southern Petrochemical Industries Co. Ltd. vs. Electricity Inspector & Etio & Ors.
Bhagwant Rai & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Ors.
State of Rajasthan & Anr. vs. J.K. Udaipur Udhyog Ltd. & Anr.
Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai vs. Dilipkumar & Co. & Ors.
Liberty Oil Mills (P) Ltd., Bombay vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bombay
State of Rajasthan & Anr. vs. J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. & Anr.
Shri Bakul Oil Industries & Anr. V. State of Gujarat
Kasinka Trading v. Union of India (1995)1 SCC 274
Shrijee Sales Corpn. v. Union of India (1997) 3 SCC 398
Liberty Oil Mills (P.) Ltd., Bombay vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bombay
S. Sundaram Pillai v. V.R.Pattabhiraman
Management of Narendra & Company Private Limited vs. Workmen of Narendra & Company
Electricity duty applies to auxiliary consumption from units whose exemption has expired, based on statutory provisions governing duty applicability.
Section 3(B)(b) of Act enables levy of electricity duty upon cancellation of exemption.
The State can withdraw exemptions from electricity duty but must provide reasonable notice to affected captive power generators to allow adjustment.
Electricity duty exemption notification linked to 'period of eligibility' in Eligibility Certificate under incentive scheme extends automatically with Certificate extension; saved by subsequent Act w....
The judgment established the importance of understanding exemption provisions, interpreting government orders, and adhering to the procedure for assessment and appeal under the relevant electricity t....
The court upheld the increased electricity duty as legal, distinguishing between tariff and duty, affirming legislative competence for revenue augmentation while rejecting claims of discrimination un....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.