IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, ABHAY J.MANTRI
Hemant Baliram Deore – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' appointments, approvals, and show-cause timelines established. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. impugned cancellations based on roster, tet, verification irregularities. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. parties' contentions; five procedural-merits issues framed. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. vague notices fail to provide specific allegations opportunity. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. seven-month delay shows inadequate material consideration. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. mass batch hearings constitute inadequate opportunity hearing. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. irregularities condonable without fraud; penalize management not employees. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 8. quash orders, restore approvals and continuous service. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
JUDGMENT :
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.
2. In all these matters, the Petitioners are individual employees, along with their Managements. The Respondents are the State Authorities on whose behalf the learned Additional G.P./AGPs have appeared.
3. Pursuant to the advertisement published in ‘Dainik Gavkari’ and ‘Dainik Punyanagari’ dated



Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore vs. Brindavan Beverages (P) Ltd. and Others
Cancellation of teacher approvals invalid due to vague show-cause notices, sham mass hearings, delay, and condonable management irregularities without fraud; protects long-serving employees, restores....
Appointments against reserved posts must adhere strictly to statutory procedures to avoid discrimination and nepotism.
An Education Officer cannot unilaterally revoke prior approvals for educational appointments without demonstrating fraud or misrepresentation, highlighting the necessity of legal process and justific....
The Education Officer's order cancelling the approval to the petitioner's appointment was illegal and led to the petitioner's wrongful termination, warranting the court's intervention and relief to t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that accrued benefits cannot be taken away without giving the concerned person a reasonable opportunity to defend specific allegations, and specifi....
Termination orders must be communicated to be effective; failure to do so renders them invalid, affirming the statutory rights of employees to their positions and benefits.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the management must adhere to the rules and regulations for the appointment of staff in private schools, including the obligation to ascertain....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.