IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN
Md. Arif Lalan Khan S/o Lalan Khan (Alias) Naseem Khan – Appellant
Versus
Dilip Bhausaheb Lande – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. election petition challenges victory on corrupt practices, violations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petition lacks material facts for cause of action. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. material facts pleaded; no need for result impact in corrupt practice. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. pleadings analyzed for shinde visit, affidavit, evm issues. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. section 83 requires material facts, corrupt practice particulars. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. undue influence requires interference with free electoral will. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 7. section 126 violation is criminal, not automatically corrupt practice. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 8. section 100(1)(d)(iv) needs material effect on result pleaded. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 9. omission of material facts warrants petition dismissal. (Para 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69) |
| 10. affidavit defects lack undue influence or material effect. (Para 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76) |
| 11. evm verification apprehension insufficient for cause of action. (Para 77 , 78) |
| 12. petition dismissed for l |
Samant N. Balkrishna & Anr. v. George Fernandez & Ors.
Udhav Singh v. Madhav Rao Scindia
Sejal Glass Limited v. Navilan Merchants Private Limited
D. Ramchandran v. R.V. Janakiraman and Ors.
Bhim Rao Baswanth Rao Patil v. K. Madan Mohan Rao and Ors.
Krishnamoorthy, Krishnamoorthy v. Sivakumar
Election petitions lacking material facts on corrupt practices like undue influence or material effect of statutory non-compliance must be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC read with Section 83 RP....
An election petition may be rejected if it fails to comply with mandatory pleading requirements regarding concise statements of material facts and particulars of corrupt practices as per the Represen....
Election petitions must plead concise material facts under Section 83(1)(a) RP Act to disclose cause of action; deficient, vague pleadings warrant dismissal under Order VII Rule 11 CPC without trial.
Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts; omission of a single material fact leads to dismissal for lack of cause of action.
Important Point :Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts and particulars of corrupt practices; failure to comply results in dismissal.
An election petition must contain concise material facts and particulars as per the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951; failure to do so results in dismissal.
Failure to comply with statutory requirements regarding material facts and submission of integral documents renders an election petition dismissible at the threshold.
Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts and particulars to maintain challenges against election results; mere alterations for honest disclosure do not invalidate nominati....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.