SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Bom) 309

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
AMIT BORKAR
Quantum Park Cooperative Housing Society Limited – Appellant
Versus
AHCL-PEL, A limited liability partnership registered under the provisions of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Siddhesh Bhole with Ms. Maithili Jha and Mr. Aryesh Gaje i/by SSB Legal Advisory
For the Respondent: Mr. Prashant P. Kulkarni, Mr. D.V. Deokar with Mr. D. Parikh i/by Parimal K. Shroff & Co., Mr. Shafi Sayed with Ms. Sunita Yadav i/by S.A. Associates, Ms. Aarushi Yadav with Mr. Aatish Jayade i/by Ms. Ravleen Sabharwal, Mr. Satyajeet P. Dighe, Smt. S.D. Chipade, AGP

Table of Content
1. development rights established via leases and agreements (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. additional area included through amalgamation subdivision (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. buildings built society formed conveyance sought (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. application rejected over area pending suits (Para 14 , 15)
5. subdivision ignored suits irrelevant jurisdiction exceeded (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
6. fsi diversion unauthorized construction disputed (Para 19 , 20)
7. authority must identify correct subdivided area (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
8. suit pendency no bar to conveyance (Para 27 , 28 , 29)
9. documents affirm buildings on specific sub-plot (Para 30 , 31 , 32)
10. deemed conveyance ordered for sub-divided land (Para 33 , 34)

JUDGMENT :

AMIT BORKAR, J.

1. The petitioner has invoked supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to assail the Judgment and Order dated 13 April 2022 passed by respondent No.10. By the said order, the application preferred by the petitioner society under Section 11(3) of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 was rejected.

2. The facts giving rise to the present petition are as follows. Respondent No.9 was t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top