IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
MANISH PITALE
Anirudha Manohar Khopade – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. partial acquisition dispute under section 94 larr act (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners' ownership and belated representations filed (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. petitioners claim section 94 for full building acquisition (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. nhai argues section 94 inapplicable to highways act (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. acquisition followed highways act procedures completely (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. petitioners ignored public notices and opportunities (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 7. statutory provisions of highways act and larr act (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 8. timely claims required under highways act notices (Para 36 , 37) |
| 9. section 94 excluded from highways act acquisitions (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 10. precedents affirm limited applicability of larr provisions (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 11. no restraint on highway construction progress (Para 47 , 48) |
| 12. consider compensation for affected interests (Para 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 13. petition partly allowed for claim consideration (Para 52 , 53 , 54) |
JUDGMENT :
Manish Pitale, J.
The petitioners have invoked Section 94 of the RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILIT
State of Maharashtra and others Vs. Reliance Industries Limited and others
Union of India and another Vs. Tarsem Singh and others
Saramma Itticheriya Vs. State of Kerala and others
P. Vajravelu Mudaliar Vs. Special Deputy Collector for Land Acquisition
Section 94 of 2013 Land Acquisition Act inapplicable to Highways Act acquisitions; only specified schedules for compensation, R&R apply. Belated claims post-award cannot halt projects, but affected u....
The right to demand full acquisition under Section 94 of the 2013 Act applies to acquisitions under the National Highways Act, ensuring just compensation and rehabilitation for affected landowners.
State legislation cannot provide lesser compensation than that guaranteed under parliamentary law, rendering it repugnant and unconstitutional.
Section 24(1)(a) of the Act, 2013 applies only to land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and not to acquisitions initiated under any other Central or State enact....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.