ARIJIT PASAYAT, DORAISWAMY RAJU
State of Andhra Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
V. Vasudeva Rao – Respondent
Judgment
Arijit Pasayat, J.—It is a strange co-incidence that the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) was enacted in the year of our country’s independence.
2. Corruption is one of the most talked about subjects today in the country since it is believed to have penetrated into every sphere of activity. It is described as wholly widespread and spectacular.
3. Corruption as such has reached dangerous heights and dangerous potentialities. The word ‘corruption’ has wide connotation and embraces almost all the spheres of our day to day life the world over. In a limited sense it connotes allowing decisions and actions of a person to be influenced not by rights or wrongs of a cause, but by the prospects of monetary gains or other selfish considerations. Avarice is a common frailty of mankind, and while Robert Walpole’s observation that every man has a price, may be a little generalized, yet it cannot be gainsaid that it is not far from truth. Burke cautioned “Among a people generally corrupt, liberty cannot last long”.
4. In this appeal, the State of Andhra Pradesh has questioned legality of judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of Andhra Prades
V.K. Sharma v. State (Delhi Admn.)
Sita Ram v. The State of Rajasthan
Suraj Mal v. State (Delhi Admn.)
M. Narsinga Rao v. State of A.P.
Suresh Budharmal Kalani v. State of Maharashtra
Raghubir Singh v. State of Punjab
Hazari Lal v. State (Delhi Admn.)
Madhukar Bhaskarrao Joshi v. State of Maharashtra
Mohmoodkhan Mahboobkhan Pathan v. State of Maharashtra
The State of Assam v. Krishna Rao
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.