Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Leela Bai – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.—This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 1.8.1997 passed by learned Special Judge, Raipur, in Special Case No.138/91, whereby and whereunder the deceased appellant B.L. Dharshan is held guilty of commission of offence under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short “the Act of 1988”) and sentenced to undergo RI for 1 year and fine of Rs.1,000 under Section 7 and RI for 1 year and fine of Rs.1,000 under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Act of 1988. In default of payment of fine on both count, additional SI for 3 months. Both the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.
2. Prosecution story, as unfolded from the records of the case and judgment of the learned trial Court, is that complainant Premlal Verma (PW2) submitted application on 25.4.1988 for supply of copy of revenue records relating to land belonging to his father before the Tahsildar, on which, order was passed directing appellant/accused to supply copies. When complainant approached the appellant, bribe of Rs.100 was demanded for supply of copy. As t
Arun Kumar Pandey v. State of M.P. 2011 (1) C.G.L.J. 99. (Para 5)
G.P. Nayyar v. State (Delhi Admn.) AIR 1979 SC 602. (Para 10)
Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh and another v. State of Vindhya Pradesh (AIR 1953 SC 394). (Para 10)
C.K. Damodaran Nair v. Govt. of India
M.O. Shamsudhin v. State of Kerala
Aher Raja Khima v. State of Saurashtra
Mahesh Prasad Gupta v. State of Rajasthan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.