MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, RAJANI DUBEY
State of Chhattisgarh – Appellant
Versus
C. P. Agre – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.
The aforesaid three appeals have been filed by the State assailing legality and validity of common judgment dated 19.4.2001 passed by learned lower appellate Court in three criminal appeal i.e. CRA No.195, CRA No.196 and CRA No.197 of 2000 filed by accused Dr.C.P. Agre, Rajkumar Upadhyay and Bali by which, the order of conviction passed by learned trial Court against the aforesaid accused has been set aside and all the accused acquitted of the charges by giving them benefit of doubt.
2. According to prosecution case, on 24.11.1992, at about 11:00 AM in the morning, respondent-accused C.P. Agre, Rajkumar, Bali and other accused assaulted Madhodas (PW2) and Dhannamal (PW2) with the help of axe, pick axe and other assaulting weapons, in which incident, these two victims sustained fracture injury on vital parts of their body. Upon report lodged by Parmanand (PW1), FIR was registered, investigation carried out and charge sheet was filed. Before the trial Court, prosecution examined two injured eyewitnesses namely Madhodas(PW2) and Dhannamal(PW3) who supported the case of the prosecution by deposing that they were assaulted by respondents-accused
Badrilal & Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2010) 14 SCC 412. (Para 6) – Referred.
State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Naresh & Ors. (2011) 4 SCC 324. (Para 14) – Relied.
Ranbir and Ors. Vs. State of Punjab (1973) 2 SCC 444. (Para 22) – Relied.
Dr. Krishna Pal and Ors. Vs. State of UP (1996) 7 SCC 194. (Para 23) – Relied.
Labh Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr. (2012) 11 SCC 690. (Para 39) – Relied.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.