SUGATO MAJUMDAR
Mangal Das Adhikary – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sugato Majumdar, J.—Both the appeals are directed against the judgment of conviction dated 26/03/2015 and order of sentence dated 27/03/2015 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, 2nd Court, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur in S.T. No. 05 (04) 2014 whereby the Appellant of CRA 226 of 2015, Mangal Das Adhikari (hereinafter mentioned as “Appellant no. 2”) was convicted under sections 363/365/366 of the Indian Penal Code and the Appellant of CRA 210 of 2015 namely Rita Jana (hereinafter mentioned as “Appellant no. 1”) was convicted under section 363/120B of the Indian Penal Code. The Appellant no. 2 was sentenced to suffer imprisonment for five years along with a fine of Rs. 5000/-, in default, a further simple imprisonment of one and half years for commission of offence under section 366 of the Indian Penal Code. The Appellant No. 2 was also sentenced to suffer imprisonment of four years with fine of Rs.2000/-, in default, a simple imprisonment of one year, for offences under section 363/365 of the Indian Penal Code. The Appellant No.1 was sentenced to suffer imprisonment of four years with fine of Rs. 2000/-, in default, a simple imprisonment of one year, for commission of offen
Shyam and Anr. vs. State of Maharashtra
Ramji Surjya and Anr. vs. State of Maharashtra
Rajesh Patel vs. State of Jharkhand
Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra
When age is in doubt, then question of taking victim away from lawful guardianship does not arise.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that serious contradictions and inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence, along with strong suspicion of concoction and afterthought due to de....
The reliability of the victim's testimony and the principle that minor discrepancies should not overshadow trustworthy evidence.
The court acquitted the appellant of kidnapping charges due to inconsistencies in the victim's statements and lack of evidence for coercion, emphasizing the principle of reasonable doubt.
Rape conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside due to unexplained nine-day FIR delay, contradictions in non-sterling victim's testimony, tutoring possibility, faulty investigation lacking corroborat....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.