SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Richa Dharu – Appellant
Versus
Hemant Panwar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Kan Singh Oad, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Kaushal Gautam with Mr. Kunal Kalla, Advocate

ORDER

This Criminal Revision Petition has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:—

“It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this criminal revision petition may kindly be allowed and it is therefore, humbly prayed that the revision petition may kindly be allowed and order dated 28.08.2019 passed by the learned Family Court No.2, Bikaner in Case No.227/2018 (586/16) titled as Richa Dharu Vs. Hemant Panwar, may kindly be quashed and set aside and the application filed by the petitioner under Section 125 Cr.P.C. may kindly be allowed and accordingly award the amount of maintenance to the petitioner Rs.30,000/- per month from the date of filing of the application.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner-wife submits that the respondent-husband is working on the post of Branch Manager in Bank of Baroda and is earning income of Rs.90,000/- per month. Learned counsel further submits that the learned court below has denied the monthly maintenance to the petitioner-wife only on the ground that the divorce has been allowed between the parties. Learned counsel also submits that the divorce was ex-parte claimed by the respondent.

3. Learned counsel has relied upon the proviso to Section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top