SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.MURALIDHAR, R.K.PATTANAIK
Anjari Rout – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: Mr. D. Das, Amicus Curiae
For the Respondent: Mr. J. Katikia, AGA

JUDGMENT

R.K. Pattanaik, J.—Instant appeal is preferred by the Appellant assailing the impugned judgment dated 19th November, 2004 passed in Sessions Case No.37/11 of 2004 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nuapada for having been convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced for life imprisonment on the grounds inter alia that it is untenable in law and therefore, deserves to be set aside.

2. Briefly stated, the informant lodged the F.I.R. dated 29th October, 2003 describing therein about the alleged incident, where after, Nuapada P.S. Case No. 99(19) was registered under Section 307 IPC. Later on, the Appellant being the husband of the victim, who succumbed to the burn injuries she received during the incident, was charge sheeted under Section 302 IPC. The prosecution adduced oral and documentary evidence during the trial. On the other hand, the Appellant did not lead any evidence. The learned court below considered the evidence of the prosecution and defence plea of the Appellant and finally concluded that the deceased suffered a homicidal death and for that, held the Appellant to be liable. As a consequence, the Appellant was convicted under Section 302 IPC and senten

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top