KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
Sreekanth Sasidharan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala represented by the Public Prosecutor – Respondent
The allegations indicate that both the petitioner and the de facto complainant, being adults, voluntarily engaged in a relationship and maintained it over a significant period. There is no evidence of force, coercion, or undue influence at the outset. Criminal proceedings should not be initiated solely because a relationship fails or does not result in a marriage. When the relationship is consensual and both parties are adults, such matters do not amount to an offence under criminal law, as the law recognizes the autonomy of adults to enter into consensual relationships.
ORDER
This Crl.M.C has been filed to quash Annexure A1 FIR in Crime No.401/2019 of Peramangalam Police Station u/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.).
2. The petitioner is the accused. The 4th respondent is the victim/defacto complainant. The offences alleged against the petitioner are punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 376 of IPC.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that during the period between 2010 to 31st March 2019, the petitioner, by giving a false promise of marriage to the 4th respondent, had sexual intercourse with her in several places in India and abroad and thereby committed the offence of rape. It is further alleged that during the period of their good relationship, the petitioner dishonestly induced the 4th respondent to deliver an amount of Rs.15,00,000/- and five sovereigns of gold and committed the offence of cheating and criminal breach by not returning the money and gold.
4. I have heard Sri.Lal K.Joseph, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.S.Sreekumar, the learned Senior Counsel for the 4th respondent and Smt.T.V.Neema, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner Sri. Lal K. Joseph submitted t
State of Karnataka vs. L. Muniswamy and Ors.
Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia and Ors. vs. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre and Ors
M/s. Neeharika Infrastucture Pvt. Ltd vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Deelip Singh vs. State of Bihar
Pradeep Kumar vs. State of Bihar
Deepak Gulati vs. State of Haryana
Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar (Dr) vs. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.