SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Kalyan Rai Surana and Malasri Nandi, JJ.
The National Investigation Agency
|through the Superintendent of Police – Appellant
versus
Shri Aheto Chophi – Respondent
Crl.A./165 of 2018
Decided on 25.8.2022

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. D.K. Das, Senior Advocate, Ms. G.D. Choudhury, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. D. Das, Advocate

IMPORTANT POINT
Bail once granted cannot be cancelled without any compelling reasons.

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Sections 437(5) and 439(2) – Cancellation of bail – Case registered for offences punishable under Sections 120B/ 121/ 122 of Indian Penal Code, read with Section 25(1-A) of Arms Act, 1959 and Section 20 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 – Special Judge was of opinion that allegations relate to factional clash between two factions of NSCN, viz., NSCK (K) and NSCN (U) and that there was nothing on record to show that respondent was involved in the clash or in any act of war with Government of India – There is no material on record to show that finding of Special Judge was erroneous – Prosecution appears to be heavily relying on statement made by a co-accused and statement of his wife, recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. to the effect that respondent had procured arms and ammunitions from deceased co-accused by threatening him – It cannot be said that Court took into account any irrelevant considerations or failed to take note of any material available in charge-sheet – Order granting bail upheld. (Paras 24, 25 and 27)

Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT (CAV)

K.R. Surana, J.—Heard Mr. D.K. Das, learned Senior counsel and Standing Counsel, NIA, assisted by Ms. G.D. Choudhury, learned counsel, appearing for the appellant and Mr. Dhanesh Das, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam, appearing for the State respondent.

2. By filing this appeal under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, the prosecuting agency, i.e. “NIA” for short has assailed the impugned order dated 20.02.2018, passed by the learned Special Judge, NIA, Nagaland in connection with Bail Application No. 48/2018, arising in connection with RC-03/2013/NIA-GUW under Sections 120B/ 121/ 122 of the Indian Penal Code, read with Section 25(1-A) of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 20 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, by which the bail was granted to the respondent, Aheto Chophi.

3. The case of the appellant i.e. NIA is that on 28.06.2012, a written complaint was lodged before the Zunheboto Police Station by the Superintendent of Police, Zunheboto to the effect that the Armed Branch Sub- Inspector (ABSI), Kughai Zhimomi, had misappropriated a huge cache of arms and ammunitions from the DEF Unit Kote. Accordingly, the Officer-in-Charge of Zunheboto Police Station registered Zunhoboto P.S. Case No. 28/2012 under Sections 120B/409/121/34 IPC read with Section 25(1-A) of Arms Act, 1959 and read with Section 7 and 8 of the Nagaland Security Regulation, 1962 and Section 29 of the Police Act, 1861.

4. As per the charge sheet No. 29/2012 dated 04.10.2012, submitted in connection with the said case, during interrogation, the accused ABSI, Kughai Zhimomi (since deceased), had voluntarily admitted that during his tenure as R.O.(Clothing) DEF, Zunheboto, he had misappropriated a huge stocks of arms and ammunitions from DEF Unit Kote and had sold the same to NSCN (K) and NSCN/GPRN faction on various occasions for his own personal gain. The arms and ammunitions which were misappropriated are as follows:—

“Arms:—

(a) SLR- 21 Nos. with 28 Nos. of Magazines.

(b) Carbine-1 No. with 2 Nos. of Magazines.

(c) Sten gun-4 Nos. with 8 Nos. of Magazines.

(d) .303 rifle-16 Nos.

Ammunitions:—

(1) 7.62 SLR: 500-600 rnds (approx).

(2) .303 BDR: 11,000-12,000.

(3) 9mm ammo: 2000 (approx).

(4) AK ammo: 200 (approx).”

5. Further, in course of investigation, verification of arms, ammunition, clothing and equipments of DEF, Zunheboto during the tenure of accused ABSI Kughai Zhimomi as RO (Clo.) in between the period of 2000 to 2012 was carried out and the following discrepancies were detected as shown below in the table wise:—

“Statement of misappropriated Arms w.e.f. 2000 to 2012

Sl. No.

Types of Arms

Misappropriated

1

SLR

21

2

Carbine

1

3

Sten gun

11

4

.303 rifle

Mk-IV=19

 

 

Mk-III=23

 

 

Total = 42

Total number of arms lost/discrepancy = 75 Nos.

Statement of misappropriated Magazines w.e.f. 2000 to 2012

Types of Magazine

Misappropriated

Sten gun

29

A.K. Rifle

3

Carbine

2

7.62 SLR

28

Total magazine lost/discrepancy

= 62 Nos.

Statement of misappropriated Ammunitions w.e.f. 2000 to 2012

Types of Ammo

Misappropriated

7.62 mm Ammo

8587

7.62x 39 mm Ammo

1701

.303 BDR

10285

.303 CTN

2256

9mm Ammo

1988

.22mm Ammo

300

Total =

26100

Total ammunition missing = 26100 rds.

Statement of misappropriated Bayonet w.e.f. 2000 to 2012

Types of bayonet

Misappropriated.

5.56 INSAS

1

AK Rifle

1

7.62 SLR

1

Total bayonet missing

= 3 Nos.

Statement of misappropriated clothing w.e.f. 2000 to 2012

Sl. No.

Particular

Misappropriated

1.

Woolen Jersey Khaki

2210 Nos.

2.

Beret cap N/Blue

11 Nos.

3.

Woolen Vest

2726 Nos.

4.

Steel Trunk

842 Nos.

5.

Ground sheet

1543 Nos.

6.

Woolen Blanket

1638 Nos.

7.

B.D. Serge

1614 Mtrs.

8.

A/Boot Black

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top