Back
M. V. MURALIDARAN
Akoijam Roshan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Officer-in-charge, Heingang Police Station – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for releasing him on bail in connection with Special Trial Case No.1 of 2018 on the file of learned Sessions Judge, Imphal East with reference to FIR No.56(3)2017 under Section 302/34 IPC on the file of Heingang Police Station.
2. The case of the prosecution is that based on the reliable information that one unidentified male dead body having blood injury was found lying at near Heingang Awang Leikai Leikha Lampak suspected to be killed in the intervening night of 21.3.2017 and 22.3.217, the then Inspector of Police, Heingang Police Station suo motu registered an FIR No.56(3)2017 under Section 302/34 IPC against unknown persons.
3. Further case of the prosecution is that since the investigation reveals the involvement of the petitioner and two others, they have been arrayed as accused and charge sheet has also been filed against them and the jurisdictional Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offence and after committal, the case is now pending before the learned Sessions Judge, Imphal East, wherein almost 11 prosecution side witnesses have been examined and the case is now par
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the grant of bail is the general rule and putting a person in jail is an exception. The court emphasized the presumption of innocence and the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that bail is the rule and jail is an exception, especially in cases where there is delay in concluding the trial and no conclusive evidence connect....
The delay in concluding the trial, the presumption of innocence, and the lack of prima facie evidence were central to the court's decision to grant bail to the petitioner.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the grant of bail depends on various factors, including the nature of the offence, the presumption of innocence, and the need for a humane att....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the discretion of the court in granting bail, considering the severity of the offence, medical grounds, and delay in trial, while emphasizing the p....
The discretion to grant bail lies with the judge, considering the severity of the offence, the presumption of innocence, and the right to speedy trial. Humane treatment of prisoners with ailments is ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the presumption of innocence lies in favor of the accused, and the object of bail is to secure appearance at trial. The judgment also emphasiz....
The main legal point established is that the presumption of innocence, the need for a speedy trial, and the balance between personal liberty and the investigational right of the police are crucial fa....
Bail granted in murder case due to hostile key witness rendering prima facie accusation doubtful, prolonged incarceration over four years amid delayed trial, no antecedents, upholding Article 21 pers....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the presumption of innocence, the importance of a speedy trial, and the humane treatment of the accused. The court emphasized the principles of bai....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
