SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA, MALASRI NANDI
State of Assam – Appellant
Versus
Ram Sankar Maurya – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
In Crl.Pet. 284/2022
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.N. Goswami, Addl. Advocate General
For the Respondents:Mr. M. Biswas, Advocate
In Crl.Pet 213/2022
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.N. Goswami, Addl. Advocate General
For the Respondents:Mr. H.R.A. Choudhury, Sr. Advocate, Mr. A. Ahmed, Advocate
In Crl.Pet 356/2022
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.N. Goswami, Addl. Advocate General
For the Respondents:Mr. Z. Kamar, Sr. Advocate, Mr. P.J. Saikia, Sr. Advocate
In Crl.Pet 358/2022
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.N. Goswami, Addl. Advocate General
For the Respondents:Mr. P.J. Saikia, Sr. Advocate, Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate
In Crl.Pet 505/2022
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.N. Goswami, Addl. Advocate General
For the Respondents:Mr. Z. Kamar, Sr. Advocate, Mr. S. Dihingia, Advocate
In Crl.Pet 517/2022
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.N. Goswami, Addl. Advocate General
For the Respondents:Mr. Z. Kamar, Sr. Advocate, Mr. S. Dihingia, Advocate
In Crl.Pet 641/2022
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.N. Goswami, Addl. Advocate General
For the Respondents:Mr. A. Sarma, Mr. P. Dutta, Advocates
In Crl.Pet 642/2022
For the Petitioners:Mr. P.N. Goswami, Addl. Advocate General
For the Respondents:Mr. N.M. Hazarika, Mr. A. Duarah, Advocates

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (CAV)

M. Zothankhuma, J.—Heard Mr. P.N. Goswami, learned Additional Advocate General for the State. Also heard Mr. Z. Kamar, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. N.H. Barbhuiya, learned counsel for the respondent in Crl. Pet. No. 505/2022 and Cr. Pet. No. 517/2022; Mr. P.J. Saikia, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. A.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent in Crl. Pet. No. 356/2022 and Crl. Pet. No. 358/2022; Mr. M. Biswas, learned counsel for the respondent in Crl. Pet. No. 284/2022; Mr. A. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent in Crl. Pet. No. 641/2022 and Mr. A. Duarah, learned counsel for the respondent in Crl. Pet. No. 642/2022.

2. This batch of petitions has been referred to by a Single Bench of this Court to decide the question “whether pending investigation, seized articles can be released by the Court, by exercising the jurisdiction, either under Section 451, or under Section 457 of the Cr.P.C.”

3. Mr. P N Goswami, learned Addl. Advocate General submits that a Court cannot release seized articles under Section 451, 457 or 102 Cr.P.C during the stage of investigation, unless and until the case reaches the stage of enquiry or trial. He

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top