YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Vidya Nand Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Shivam Yadav, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Pankaj Saxena, learned Additional Government Advocate-I appearing along with Ms. Sushma Soni, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State-opposite party.
2. Present criminal revision has been preferred seeking to set-aside the order dated 7.7.2021, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kushinagar at Padrauna, whereby the application filed by revisionist under Section 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, [The Code], for release of truck seized under Section 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, [MMDR Act], has been rejected.
3. Pleadings of the case indicate that the vehicle owned by the revisionist, a truck carrying gitti (a minor mineral), was seized by the Mines Inspector, Kushinagar on 19.4.2021, and a report was forwarded to the District Officer for further proceedings under Rule 74 of the Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963, [The Concession Rules]. The revisionist claims to have approached the District Officer and thereafter he filed an application under Section 457 of the Code before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kushinagar at
Smt. Sudha Kesarwani vs. State of U.P. and Another
Jayant and Others vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Mohammad Raza vs. State of U.P. and Another
The State of Punjab v. Barkat Ram
Badaku Joti Svant v. State of Mysore
Jagabandhu Mahanta v. Bijay Kumar Kar and Another
Balkishan A. Devidayal v. State of Maharashtra
Raja Ram Jaiswal v. State of Bihar
Awadhesh Tripathi v. State of U.P.
Assistant Collector of Customs v. Smt. Maria Rege and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.