SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ASHOKKUMAR C. JOSHI
Chandrakant Gunvantrai Pandya – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant No.1: Mr. Dipen K Dave (3296)
For the Respondent No.1: Ms. Maithili Mehta, APP

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

This successive bail application is filed by the Applicant – Accused viz. Chandrakant Gunvantrai Pandya under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with I-C.R.No.15 of 2019 registered with ACB Police Station, Ahmedabad, District : Ahmedabad (City) for the offences punishable under Sections 13(1)(B) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and under Section 109 of the IPC.

2. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Dipen K. Dave for the Applicant and learned APP Ms. Maithili Mehta for the Respondent State through Video Conference.

3. The facts in nutshell, as per the main allegations against the applicant in the F.I.R. is that on 05.04.2019, Assistant Director, Field - 2, ACB, Gujarat State, Ahmedabad has filed a complaint stating that the order came to be passed by Assistant Director, ACB, Gujarat State against the applicant-accused viz. Chandrakant Gunvantrai Pandya, the then Additional Resident Collector, Surendranagar for making disproportionate assets and the complainant herein has made preliminary

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top