BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Vibha Kankanwadi and Y.G. Khobragade, JJ.
Satish – Appellant
versus
State of Maharashtra through
Sakri Police Station and Anr. – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No.792 of 2015
Decided on 15.3.2023
(A) Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Sections 137 and 165 read with Section 118 – Cross-examination of witness – Purpose of cross-examination is not just to extract admissions by putting witness in confusion or by asking some misleading questions – Purpose of cross-examination is to give opportunity to defence for ascertaining truth – It is duty of prosecution, defence as well as Court to ascertain truth from any witness including child witness and it is duty of Court to see that witness understands the question – When such misleading questions are asked or sometimes a pressure tactic is also used on witness, Presiding Officer of Trial is supposed to intervene – Purpose of Section 165 of Evidence Act which provides for power of Judges to put questions or order production is to safeguard interest of justice. (Para 11)
(B) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 – Sections 3(1)(xii) – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 376(2)(f) – Rape of minor girl – Conviction and sentence – Even if oath is not administered, yet if it is found that witness is trustworthy/reliable, then testimony can be accepted even without administration of oath – No fault can be found about late disclosure of name of accused by girl herself – Medical evidence supports testimony of victim – Offence under Section 3(2)(v) of Atrocities Act is also proved – Conviction of accused under both sections maintained – Accused has committed one of the heinous crimes – Life of a small child aged 6 has been ruined – Rape on a victim leaves a scar throughout life and there is no question of showing leniency to such accused person – Appeal dismissed. (Paras 13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22 and 23)
Result: Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT
Vibha Kankanwadi, J.—The appellant is the original accused in Sessions Case No.225 of 2012. He has been held guilty of committing offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for fifteen years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for two months. He has been further held guilty of committing offence punishable under Sections 3(1)(xii) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “Atrocities Act”) and has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 20 days. The fine amount if realized, is directed to be given to the victim as compensation and it is to be given in the name of informant as guardian of the minor victim. The present appeal challenges this judgment and order by the learned Special Judge, Dhule passed on 19.03.2015.
2. The prosecution story in short is that the informant lodged FIR to Sakri Police Station on 13.09.2012. Informant is the mother of the victim. Victim was aged 6 years on the date of the incident. The incident took place at 8.00 p.m. on 12.09.2012. The informant - mother and her in-laws were in the house and the husband i.e. father of the victim had gone to another village. The victim came crying inside the house and she was holding her nicker/shorts in her hand and the blood oozing from her private part was coming down from the thighs. She complained about the pain in the private part. Thereupon the informant - mother asked her as to what has happened. The girl disclosed that when she was playing in the courtyard of their house, a person came and by gagging her mouth, lifted her on his shoulder and then took her to the bank of the river in the said village. That person slapped her and threatened that if she cries anymore, he would cut her into pieces. The said person laid her over the grass near the bank of the river and then after taking out lower clothes, slept on her. She also disclosed that there was severe pain to her and she started to cry and then the said person assaulted her and ran away towards another village from the river. After the said disclosure by the girl to the mother, the mother disclosed it to her father-in-law. They had taken the victim to the spot and she had then shown the said spot to them. The grass at the said spot was trodden and then the informant had gone to the police station and lodged the report.
3. After the registration of the offence vide Crime No.180 of 2012 with Sakri Police Station, the victim was referred to Civil Hospital, Dhule and the medical examination was conducted. It is the further prosecution story that the victim was in shock from 13.09.2012 to 16.09.2012, as she was not in a position to talk. Her statement was not recorded, but then after she was made comfortable on 16.09.2012, she disclosed the name of the person as “Satya”. Thereafter, the parents given the full name of Satya as Satish Ramesh Nandre i.e. present accused. This is how he was connected to the present offence. He came to be then arrested during the course of the investigation. Prior to that the investigating officer API Nimbhore had visited the spot and carried out spot panchanama. Clothes of the victim were produced by the grandfather at the house and those clothes were seized by drawing panchanama. After the arrest of the accused, he was sent for the medical examination. It was then revealed that the victim is a member of Scheduled Tribe i.e. from Bhil community and the accused was not a member of either Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe. Therefore, the offence punishable under Section 3(1)(xii) of the Atrocities Act came to be added and further investigation has been carried out by the police officer of the rank of Sub Divisional Police Officer. The school leaving certificate of the accused and caste
(1) Purpose of cross-examination is not just to extract admissions by putting witness in confusion or by asking some misleading questions – Purpose of cross-examination is to give opportunity to defe....
The competence of child witnesses, scrutiny of hostile witnesses' testimony, and the significance of corroborative evidence and the presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act are central legal pri....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on the consistency and reliability of the victim's testimony, the absence of prevarication, and the corroboration of evidence to estab....
Sentence must be based on comparative analysis of aggravating and mitigating circumstances.
The conviction for sexual assault on a minor was upheld based on credible testimony and corroborative medical evidence, establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on school records, legal precedents, and medical evidence to establish the victim's age and prove the aggravated penetrative sexual as....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on consistent testimonies, medical evidence, and the severity of the crime to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.