Sanjay Jain (In JC) VS Enforcement Directorate

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

VIKAS MAHAJAN
Sanjay Jain (In JC) – Appellant
Versus
Enforcement Directorate – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Madhav Khurana, Ms. Stuti Gujral, Ms. Trisha Mittal, Ms. Shaurya Singh, Mr. Faisal Zia Ahmed and Mr. Harsh Yadav, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Spl. Counsel of ED, Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Mr. Baibhav and Mr. Hasnain Khawja, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Vikas Mahajan, J.—The present petition has been filed through the wife/ pairokar of the petitioner seeking enlargement of the petitioner on regular bail in connection with ECIR No. DLZO-I/43/2021 dated 20.05.2021 in Ct. C. No. 17/2021 titled as Directorate of Enforcement v. Amarendra Dhari Singh &Ors., pending before the Court of Ld. Special Judge (PC Act CBI-23), Rouse Avenue Courts, New Delhi.

2. During the pendency of the regular bail, the wife of the petitioner has filed an affidavit dated 22.05.2023 praying for grant of interim bail to the petitioner on medical and humanitarian grounds for a period of 3 months alleging precarious health of the petitioner.

3. In the affidavit of the wife of the petitioner, it is stated that the petitioner is aged about 57 years and is suffering from various pre-existing ailments like hypertension, depression and anxiety, obstructive sleep apnea, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, damaged mitral valve prolapse and has a history of soft teeth. It is also stated that the health condition of the petitioner has further worsened in jail and h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

VIKAS MAHAJANSanjay Jain (In JC) – AppellantVersusEnforcement Directorate – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

VIKAS MAHAJAN
Sanjay Jain (In JC) – Appellant
Versus
Enforcement Directorate – Respondent