IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
Sameer Mahandru – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
Crl. M.A. 10859 of 2023 In Bail Appln. 1343 of 2023
Decided On : 12-06-2023
Bail - Medical Grounds - PMLA - [SICK OR INFIRM] - [PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT, 2002 (PMLA) SECTIONS 45(1) AND 45(1) PROVISO] - [SUMMARY]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought interim bail on medical grounds due to severe health conditions, including chronic backache, multiple surgeries, and life-threatening diseases. The petitioner was granted interim bail twice by the Trial Court, and there were no allegations of misuse of liberty or flight risk. The co-accused in the same case had been granted regular bail on medical grounds.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the petitioner's health conditions warranted immediate medical attention and post-operative care, satisfying the test of the proviso to Section 45(1) of the PMLA. The Court noted that the petitioner's condition was worse than the co-accused who had been granted regular bail. The Court also considered the absence of misuse of liberty and flight risk by the petitioner.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner's severe health conditions qualified for interim bail on medical grounds under the proviso to Section 45(1) of the PMLA.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the petitioner's life-threatening diseases and inability to perform routine activities due to infirmity qualified for interim bail under the proviso to Section 45(1) of the PMLA. The Court also considered the absence of misuse of liberty and flight risk by the petitioner.
Final Decision: The Court granted the petitioner interim bail for six weeks, subject to various conditions, including restrictions on leaving the hospital and house, surrendering before the Trial Court, and not engaging in criminal activities or tampering with evidence.
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
CRL. M.A. 10859/2023
1. The present application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "Cr.P.C.") read with Sections 45 and 65 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as "PMLA") has been filed by the applicant/petitioner seeking interim bail for the petitioner in relation to ECIR/HIU-II/14/2022 registered under Sections 3 and 4 of the PMLA, at PS CBI.
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. The petitioner formed a Partnership Firm "Indo Spirits" with one Arun Ramachandran Pillai and one Prem Rahul Manduri for the wholesale L-l license under the Delhi Excise Policy, 2021-22. As per the license, the company of the petitioner i.e., Indospirit Distribution Limited (wherein the petitioner had 38.27% shareholding) got 35% in the said firm, Arun Ramachandran Pillai got 32.5% and Prem Rahul Manduri got 32.5%. On 29th October 2021, the `Indo Spirits' applied for the Wholesale L-l License, and was granted the same on 8th November 2021, by Delhi Excise Department. The firm then commenced its business operations from 17th November 2021 in terms of Excise Policy 2021-22. During this period, several manufacturers appointed the Firm, Indo Spirits, as their Wholesale Distributor in Delhi under the new Excise Policy. The New Excise Policy, 2021-22 came to be challenged on various grounds.
3. Subsequently, on 17th August 2022, CBI registered FIR No. RC0032022A0053 under Sections 120B and 477A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as "IPC") and Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as "PCA") on the complaint of the Lt. Governor, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) against the petitioner and other accused persons regarding irregularities committed in the framing and implementation of the excise policy of the GNCTD for the year 2021-22.
4. The CBI conducted searches on several premises in Delhi and across the Country, including the residential and business premises of the petitioner, which also led to seizures of the assets of the petitioner. Consequently, the Directorate of Enforcement (hereinafter referred to as "ED") registered an ECIR bearing No. ECIR/HIU-II/14/2022.
5. The role ascribed to the petitioner in the Prosecution Complaint is that there are advance kickbacks of around Rs. 100 crores that were paid to the public servants in this conspiracy between the political persons, and Government officers/officials causing a total loss of Rs. 2873 cores to the exchequer of GNCTD and the petitioner along with other accused have key roles in the commission of the offence of money laundering as they were involved directly or indirectly, in the process or activities relating to the above proceeds of crime or its concealment, possession, acquisition, use, and projections or claiming it to be untainted property.
6. The petitioner was arrested in the present case on 28th September 2022. The Ld. Trial Court took cognizance of the predicate offences vide its Order dated 15th December 2022 and of the offences alleged under the ECIR vide order dated 20th December 2022.
7. During the pendency of the Trial of matter arising out of the ECIR, the petitioner sought and was granted interim bail on 28th February 2023 on medical grounds for undertaking surgery for removal of gall bladder stones and for the treatment of his back pain and other ailments. Since the petitioner was advised to undergo another surgery for his lower back, he sought an extension of interim medical bail and the same was granted by the Ld. Trial Court vide order dated 18th April 2023 till 1st May 2023. The petitioner is on interim bail since 28th February 2023 yet in constructive judicial custody and by way of the instant application, he is seeking extension of his interim bail on account of his deteriorating medical condition.
SUBMISSIONS
On behalf of the petitioner
8. Mr. Vikas Pahwa, learned senior counsel appearing on
The judgment established that severe health conditions, including life-threatening diseases and inability to perform routine activities due to infirmity, can qualify for interim bail on medical groun....
The discretion to grant bail on medical grounds should be exercised judiciously, guided by principles of law and after recording satisfaction that necessary circumstances exist warranting such a disc....
Bail on medical and humanitarian grounds – Merely because a person is an undertrial or even a convict, lodged in jail, this facet of right to life cannot be curtailed.
The court interpreted the proviso to section 45(1) of the PMLA and determined the eligibility for bail based on the Applicant's medical condition, distinguishing between being 'sick' and 'infirm'. Th....
The main legal point established is that a person who is sick or infirm, as defined under Section 45 of the PMLA, may be entitled to seek bail based on their medical condition.
The urgency and criticality of life-threatening medical conditions can warrant interim bail under Section 45 of PMLA, especially when specialized care is unavailable in judicial custody.
Personal liberty must be preserved; serious medical conditions warranting special care can justify bail under the PMLA's proviso to Section 45(1).
The court recognized health conditions as sufficient grounds for granting bail despite strict provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.
The court held that bail may be granted under Section 45(1) of PMLA for sick or infirm individuals, emphasizing humane considerations in light of critical health conditions.
The court clarified the 'sick and infirm' criteria under Section 45(1) of the PMLA, emphasizing that serious health conditions can warrant bail, overriding traditional restrictions related to the nat....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.