ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
K. Sreenivasa Reddy, J.
Suresh Goyal – Petitioner
versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
Criminal Petition No.2904 of 2023
Decided on 12.5.2023
Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 – Section 45 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Sections 437 and 439 – Bail petition – Diversion of funds through shell companies – Petitioner is a Chartered Accountant by profession – Except stating that petitioner was instrumental in assisting accused in diversion of funds to shell companies, there is no other material to connect petitioner to crime – Petitioner was arrested on 04.03.2023 and since then he is in judicial custody – Petitioner is continuously attending before investigating agency and co-operating with investigation – It is not necessary to detain petitioner in jail further – Request of petitioner for grant of bail can be considered, however, on certain conditions – Bail granted. (Paras 12, 15, 17 and 18)
Result: Criminal Petition allowed. Bail granted.
ORDER
This Criminal Petition, under Sections 437 and 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘CrPC’), is filed seeking to enlarge the petitioner/A.4 on bail in case information report in F.No.ECIR/HYZO/03/2022 of Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad Zonal Office.
2. A case in crime No.29 of 2021of C.I.D. p.s., A.P., Amarvathi, Mangalagiri has been registered for the offences punishable under Sections 166, 167, 418, 420, 465, 468, 471, 409, 201, 109 read with 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘IPC’) and 13 (2) read with 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. based on a report lodged by the Chairman of Andhra Pradesh State Skill Development Corporation, Andhra Pradesh (for short, ‘APSSDC’). The petitioner herein is arrayed as A.20 in the said crime. The aforesaid FIR has been registered against one Ghanta Subba Rao, the then Special Secretary of Government, Skill Development, Entrepreneurship and Innovation Department, M/s. Siemens Industry Software India Private Limited (SISW), M/s. Design Tech System Private Limited (DTSPL) and others for allegedly swindling of money invested by the Government in a dubious manner. According to the said FIR, APSSDC entered into a Memorandum of Association (MoA) with SIEMENS (combination of SISW and DTSPL), to impart Hi-end technology training to the trainers of APSSDC, pursuant to which DTSPL had to provide training software development including various sub modules designed for the high-end software for advanced manufacturing CAD/CAM, and the MoA does not contemplate any sub contract. As part of the SIEMENS project, 6 clusters at a cost of Rs.546.84 crores (per cluster) were to be formed in which 90% of the total project cost i.e. Rs.2951.00 crores was supposed to be borne by M/s. SISW and M/s. DTSPL, and the remaining 10% i.e. Rs.330.00 crores was supposed to be borne by the Government. The total project cost for establishing 6 SIEMENS clusters amount to Rs.3281.40 crores.
3. Since Sections 120B, 418, 420, 471 IPC and Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are scheduled offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short, ‘PMLA’), investigation was initiated under the aforesaid case information report dated 07.01.2022. The petitioner herein is arrayed as A.4 in the said case information report. In the course of investigation, the respondent recorded statements of various persons, collected documents/information from agencies, banks, entities, etc. and analyzed bank accounts, and it revealed many discrepancies including diversion of APSSDC funds through various shell companies; the vendors from whom purchases were shown to have been made were pre-decided in advance; major portion of funds were transferred to Skillar Enterprise India Private Limited (SEPL) which was incorporated post ‘tri party agreement’ signed among M/s. DTSPL, SISW and APSSDC for implementation of SIEMENS project; major portion of the funds received from the government in the account of Execution Partner M/s. DTSPL was diverted to this newly opened entity SEPL, which has no past experience to execute the scope of work, and SEPL was used for diversion of Government funds which was meant for SIEMENS project. It has been further revealed that major portion of funds were diverted by SEPL to suspicious entities under the guise of supply of software/hardware/materials/ services, which, in reality, was not done. The purpose of diversion of funds was to generate cash and thereby siphon off money from the system without utilizing the same for the SIEMENS project for which the Government sanctioned the funds. On examination of data and analysis of bank account statements revealed that out of the funds received by SEPL from APSSDC through DTSPL, Rs.56.00 crores (approx..) was transferred by SEPL to an entity Allied Computers International Asia Limited (ACI), and the said amount was diverted through a web of shell entities by way of layered transactions.
Order granting bail must demonstrate application of mind as to why applicant has been granted or denied privilege of bail.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of bail provisions under PMLA and the conditions for granting bail in money laundering cases.
The court emphasized the right to a speedy trial and liberty, allowing bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act after 15 months of custody, citing no likelihood of trial commencement.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of the existence of proceeds of crime for the commission of an offence of money laundering under the Prevention of Money Launderin....
Bail should not be denied as a form of punishment; however, in cases of money laundering, serious allegations and potential interference with investigations warrant careful consideration against bail....
The conditions for granting bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act are mandatory, requiring the court to be satisfied of the accused's non-guilt and lack of likelihood to commit further of....
The gravity of the alleged offences, the petitioner's non-cooperation, and the potential flight risk outweighed any entitlement to bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.