SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRITINKER DIWAKER, NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Indra Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Sri Noor Mohammad, Advocate
For the Respondent: Sri Amit Sinha, AGA & Ms. Mayuri Mehrotra, State Counsel

JUDGMENT

Nalin Kumar Srivastava, J.—Since these appeals have been preferred against the same judgment and relate to same Crime Number, they were heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.

2. The Special Judge (DAA)/Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.5, Etah by judgment and order dated 22.11.2008 passed in Special Sessions Trial No. 25 of 1998 (Crime No. 346 of 1997), P.S. Soron, District Etah convicted and sentenced the appellants under Section 364A I.P.C. to undergo life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 2,000/- each and under Section 307 I.P.C. read with Section 149 I.P.C. to undergo seven years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 500/- each and in default of payment of fine, to undergo three months additional rigorous imprisonment. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently. Aggrieved with the said judgment, present appeals have been preferred by the appellants.

3. Brief facts, as culled out from the record, are that a First Information Report was lodged by the informant, Chandra Pal son of Roopram, resident of Badanpur, Police Station Soron, District Etah, on 22.11.1997 at 2.45 p.m., with the averments that in the night of 21/22.11.1997, as usu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top