SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Mahendra Bhuian Son of Sammal @ Shyamalal Bhuian – Appellant
Versus
State Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. Both the appeals since arisen out of common judgment of conviction dated 12.07.2017 and order of sentence dated 15.07.2017, hence, these appeals have been directed to be heard together and are being disposed of by this common order/judgment.
2. The instant appeals, filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, are directed against the judgment of conviction dated 12.07.2017 and order of sentence dated 15.07.2017 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-IV, Chatra in S.T. Case No.48 of 2013, whereby and whereunder, the appellants have been convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I for life along with fine of Rs.10,000/-for the offence under Section 364-A of the IPC and in case of default of payment of fine, they have further been directed to undergo imprisonment for nine months.
3. This Court, before proceeding to examine the legality and propriety of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, deems it fit and proper to refer the background of prosecution case, as per the written report of the informant, which reads as under:
4. As per the written report of the informant dated 18.07.2012, the prosecution story in brief is that
Acharaparambath Pradeepan v. State of Kerala
Gireesan Nair and Others vs. State of Kerala
Lohit Kaushal vs. State of Haryana
Ravi Dhingra vs. State of Haryana
Rajesh Govind Jagesha v. State of Maharashtra
Suresh Chandra Bahri v. State of Bihar
State of A.P. v. M.V. Ramana Reddy
State of U.P. vs. Wasif Haider and others
Vikram Singh vs. Union of India
Vishwanath Gupta v. State of Uttaranchal reported in (2007) 11 SCC 633
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.