Back
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Kunwar Ganjhu – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through National Investigation Agency – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.—The instant appeal preferred under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 is directed against the order dated 13.02.2023 passed by the AJC-XVI-cum-Spl. Judge, NIA, Ranchi in Misc. Cr. Application No.183 of 2023 [Special (NIA) Case No.03 of 2020], corresponding to R.C. No.38 of 2021/NIA/DLI, arising out of Chandwa P.S. Case No.04 of 2020 registered for the offence under Sections 386, 411 and 120B of the I.P.C., Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act and Sections 13, 16, 17, 20, 21 & 23 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for regular bail of the appellant has been rejected.
Facts
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case leading to this Criminal Appeal is that on 05.01.2020, Inspector cum SHO of Chandwa police station had received a reliable information that three persons came at Budhbazar, Chandwa by a motor-cycle bearing registration number JH 01 CW773 after collecting levy from a contractor and further proceeding to deliver the amount to Maoist Ravindra Ganjhu (A-4).
3. On receipt of the said information, the SHO along with his staff reached near Shiv Mandir, Budhbazar and noticed that 03 pe
Bail – Being a member of banned organization is also an offence under UA(P) Act and bail can be declined.
The court established that involvement with a banned terrorist organization and the collection of levies for such groups constitutes serious offenses under the UA(P) Act, warranting denial of bail wh....
The court established that under the UA(P) Act, particularly Section 43D(5), bail can be denied if there are reasonable grounds to believe the accusations against the accused are prima facie true, em....
The court confirmed that under Section 43D(5) of UAPA, bail cannot be granted if there are reasonable grounds to believe the accusations are prima facie true.
The court upheld the denial of bail under UAPA, emphasizing the serious nature of the allegations and the prima facie case against the appellant, which posed a threat to national security.
The court established that a prima facie case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act requires a lighter evidentiary burden, allowing for bail denial where reasonable grounds for believing acc....
The court upheld the denial of bail under the UAP Act, emphasizing the serious nature of the charges and the prima facie evidence against the appellant.
The court established that for bail applications under the UAP Act, the prosecution must provide reasonable grounds for believing the accusations are prima facie true, and that mere membership in a b....
The court held that the Special Court did not err in dismissing the appellant's bail application, as there were reasonable grounds to believe that the accusations against the appellant were prima fac....
(1) If Court is satisfied after examining material on record that there are no reasonable grounds for believing that accusation against accused is prima facie true, then accused is entitled to bail.(....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
