SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Mangal Munda S/o Ato Munda – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through National Investigation Agency – Respondent
ORDER :
I.A. No. 1487 of 2024
1. The instant application has been filed for condoning the delay of 10 days in filing the appeal though not under Section 21(5) of the NIA Act but under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the said Interlocutory Application has been filed due to inadvertence since before filing of the instant application, one Interlocutory Application being I.A. No. 10052 of 2022 was filed, hence submission has been made that the instant Interlocutory Application is not being pressed.
3. Considering the aforesaid submission, the instant Interlocutory Application is dismissed as not pressed.
I.A. No. 10052 of 2022
4. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant has sought for leave of this Court to make necessary correction, in the provision of law under which the instant application has been filed, by deleting ‘5 of the Limitation Act’ and in place thereof inserting ‘21(5) of the N.I.A. Act’.
5. Considering the nature of prayer, let necessary correction be done by him in course of day in the instant Interlocutory Application.
6. The instant application has been filed for condonation of delay of 10 day in filing the appe
National Investigation Agency v. Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali
The court upheld the denial of bail under UAPA, emphasizing the serious nature of the allegations and the prima facie case against the appellant, which posed a threat to national security.
The court confirmed that under Section 43D(5) of UAPA, bail cannot be granted if there are reasonable grounds to believe the accusations are prima facie true.
The court established that under the UA(P) Act, particularly Section 43D(5), bail can be denied if there are reasonable grounds to believe the accusations against the accused are prima facie true, em....
The court affirmed that bail under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act requires prima facie evidence of guilt, emphasizing the severity of charges against the appellant and ongoing trial facts.
The court established that involvement with a banned terrorist organization and the collection of levies for such groups constitutes serious offenses under the UA(P) Act, warranting denial of bail wh....
(1) Regular bail – Issue of national integrity is also to be taken care of so as to maintain balance.(2) Precedent – Ratio of judgment is to be applied on the basis of factual aspect involved in each....
Bail – Being a member of banned organization is also an offence under UA(P) Act and bail can be declined.
The court established that a prima facie case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act requires a lighter evidentiary burden, allowing for bail denial where reasonable grounds for believing acc....
The main legal point established is that the grant of bail under UAPA requires a prima facie view of the accused's involvement, balancing of various factors, and imposition of stringent conditions to....
The court upheld the denial of bail under the UAP Act, emphasizing the serious nature of the charges and the prima facie evidence against the appellant.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.