SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K. LAKSHMAN, P. SREE SUDHA
Mohammed Abdul Mobeen Mobin – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:T Rahul, Advocate
For the Respondent: P. Vishnuvardhana Reddy SPL PP for NIA

JUDGMENT (COMMON)

K. Lakshman, J.—Heard Mr. V. Raghunath, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. T. Rahul, learned counsel for the appellant(s) in Crl.A. Nos.797, 912, 56, 57 & 80 of 2023, Mr. Shaik Mohd. Rizwan Akhtar, learned counsel for the appellant in Crl.A.Nos.969 & 62 of 2023 and Mr. Mohd. Moinuddin, learned counsel for the appellant in Crl.A. No.61 of 2024, and also Mr. B. Narasimha Sharma, learned Additional Solicitor General of India and Mr. P. Vishnuvardhan Reddy, learned Special Public Prosecutor for National Investigation Agency (NIA) appearing on behalf of the respondent.

2. Criminal Appeal Nos.57, 62 & 61 of 2024, 912 of 2023 and 56 & 80 of 2024 are filed by accused Nos.5, 24, 7, 16, 28, 34 and 35 respectively challenging the orders, dated 13.12.2023, 15.12.2023, 19.09.2023, 08.12.2023 and 29.12.2023 in Crl.M.P. Nos.1623, 1663, 1621, 1184, 1451 and 1839 of 2023 in Spl.S.C.No.1 of 2023, respectively passed by learned IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge-cum-Special Court for NIA Cases, Nampally, Hyderabad (for short (for short ‘Special Court’) dismissing the bail applications filed by them.

3. Criminal Appeal Nos.797 and 969 of 2023 are filed by accused Nos.32 an


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top