SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

N. J. JAMADAR
Dinesh Ganesh Indre – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicants:Mr. Pankaj More with Nitin Kamble and Sukrut Mhatre, Advocates
For the Respondent No.1: Ms. Ranjana D. Humane, APP

JUDGMENT

The applicants, who have been arraigned in CR No. 497 of 2023 registered with Malad Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 394, 395 and 412 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“the Penal Code”), Sections 37 (1)(A) 135 read with Section 142 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, have preferred this application to enlarge him on bail.

2. The gravamen of indictment against the applicants and the co-accused is that in pursuance of a criminal conspiracy, on 20th August, 2023, the first informant was robbed of cash of Rs.1,25,00,000/- kept in two bags by threatening to cause death by pointing a knife. It is further alleged that the applicant and the co-accused had retained the cash amount despite having known that the cash was robbed from the first informant.

3. Applicant No. 1 – Dinesh (A5), the applicant No. 2-Pratik Bhojane (A6) were arrested on 2nd September, 2023 and applicant No. 4-Ravi Yashawante (A8) was arrested on 4th September, 2023.

4. During the course of investigation, it transpired that the co-accused Krushna Godambe (A11), who came to be arrested on 10th September, 2023, was the leader of an organized crime syndicate. Thus, w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top