SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
Julakanti Brahma Reddy @ Brahma Nanda Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: LEO Law Associates LLP
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor (AP)

ORDER

This criminal petition under section 438 of the CrPC is filed by the petitioners/accused to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.113 of 2023 of Macherla Rural Police Station of Palnadu District for the offences punishable under Sections 337, 364, 34 IPC and Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

2. Heard arguments of learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent/State. On 02.01.2024, respondent agreed to take out notices to de facto complainant. None entered appearance for de facto complainant.

3. For petitioner, it is argued

• Petitioner is innocent and did not participate in the alleged crime incident.

• Facts do not make out a case for applying any of the penal provisions alleged.

• In terms of law laid down by the courts application for anticipatory bail is maintainable.

For respondents, it is argued

• Since it is a case of caste atrocity, the application for anticipatory bail is not maintainable.

4. Perused the record.

5. As one could notice the offences alleged are both under IPC, 1860 as well as SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The applicati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top