Sikandar Singh VS State of Punjab

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

KIRTI SINGH
Sikandar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Deepak Sabherwal, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Vinay Kumar, DAG, Punjab
For the Respondent No.2:Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Kirti Singh, J.—Apprehending arrest the petitioner has filed this second petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred as ‘BNSS’) for grant of anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.111 dated 01.11.2022, under Sections 302, 307 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 25/27 of Arms Act 1959, registered at Police Station Khalra, District Tarn Taran.

2. Earlier the petitioner had approached this Court for grant of anticipatory bail by filing CRM-M-38379-2024 which was dismissed on merits vide order dated 10.09.2024. Now the second petition under Section 482 of BNSS has been filed seeking the same relief.

3. It has been argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that there were various documents which were sine qua non for deciding the bail application of the petitioner which were neither referred nor placed on record and mentioned in the petition. The list of documents which were not referred to in the first anticipatory bail petition are as under:-

(a) Copy of the supplementary statement of the complainant dated 27.01.2023;

(b) Statement of the eye witnesses Balwinder Singh under Section 161 Cr.P.C. dated 0