SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1683

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
SUMEET GOEL, J. 
Ajarudin @ Azru – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana
CRM-M-44113-2024
Decided on : 06-09-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Sarfaraj Anjum Mor, Advocate
For the Respondent: Ms. Mahima Yashpal, DAG, Haryana

JUDGMENT :

Sumeet Goel, J.

1. The present third petition has been filed by the petitioner-Ajarudin @ Azru under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as 'the BNSS') seeking pre-arrest/anticipatory bail in FIR No.107 dated 01.05.2019 registered under Sections 376-D, 379B, 506 of IPC and Section 67-A of IT Act at Women Police Station Nuh District Nuh, Haryana.

2. The case set up in the FIR in question (as set out by the petitioner in the petition) is as follows:

"To, P.S. Women Station, Nuh, Subject: application for registration of the case against 1. Rahun@ Rahul s/o Nasru, R/o village Nawli (Kotawas), 2. Azru s/o Amin, R/o Thalchana, Tehsil Pahari (Rajasthan), 3. Kala s/o Kamru, R/o Tapkan, P.S. and Distt. Nuh. Sir, it is requested that I, Aarastoon w/o Shokeen permanent resident of village Sakras, P.S. Ferozepur Jhirka, Distt. Nuh and a house maker. About 2% months ago that I had came to my parental village Nawli and my elder son Abrar used to remain ill. That I was going to Nalhar hospital, Nuh for his treatment and when I was waiting for passenger vehicle while standing at Bodi Kothi then accused Rahun @Rahul, who is resident of my parental village Nawli, to whom I know him already, came on his Splender motorcycle having black colour and asked me that where you are going, thereupon I replied that I am going to Nalhar Hospital for getting treatment of my son. Thereupon Rahun @ Rahul said that I am also going to Nalhar Hospital for my own work and I will also drop you over there. Having acquaintance with him, I sat on his motorcycle of Rahun @ Rahul. When we reached at Badkali Chowk then there one boy namely Azru s/o Amin met us over there. He said to Rahul @ Rahun that he has urgent work and come with me for a while. Then accused Azru also took ride with us on the same motorcycle and accused Rahun @ Rahul took his motorcycle towards Punhana. When we reached 2% kilometers away from the Badkali Chowk then Rahun@ Rahul stopped his motorcycle at a isolated place with a pulia falling under the road and accused Rahun @ Rahul called another boy Kala @ Kamru, R/o Tapkan Distt. Nuh by making a telephonic call. That Kala was holding a cold drink bottle, took me to the mustered field and started making obscene activity. When I objected it to then Kala taken out a country made pistol (Katta) from his trouser and given it to Rahun @ Rahul.

That accused Rahun @ Rahul put this country made pistol (Katta) on the temple of my son Abrar and said that if you do not agree to our asking then your son will be eliminated. That seeing the danger to the life of my son, I surrendered myself in their demands of accused Rahun @Rahul and accused Rahun @ Rahul committed rape with me against my wish and his friend Azru also committed rape with me against my wish and they captured a video of my rape in the phone of Rahun @Rahul and Azru snatched golden chain (Hansli) from my neck and accused Rahun @ Rahul also robbed of Rs.2000/-from me. Thereafter, all three accused ran away while dropping me at Badkali Chowk and said to me while going that in case you tell this things to anyone then we will kill you and your son. We have made your video and will uploaded it on Net. Till today, I kept my self silent on account of fear of defame but now I came to know that accused Rahun @Rahul uploaded this video on net and by which I have been highly defamed in the society. Thus, it is requested to you to take strict action against the accused persons while registering case. Sd/- Aarastoon"

3. The present petition is the third attempt by the petitioner to secure anticipatory bail.

3.1 The first petition (for grant of anticipatory bail) was dismissed vide order dated 30.07.2021 by a coordinate Bench of this Court, relevant whereof reads as under:

"1. xxx xxx xxx xxx

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner herein has been falsely implicated in the present case, as the allegations as set out in the FIR are not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top