Sushil Kumar Srivastava VS State of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

HARISH KUMAR
Sushil Kumar Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vikash Kumar Pankaj and Mr. Rishav Dev, Advocates
For the Opp. Parties:Ms. Poonam Kumari Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Heard Mr. Vikash Kumar Pankaj, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Ms. Poonam Kumari Singh, learned Advocate for the Union of India.

2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court by filing the present quashing application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure; 1973 assailing the impugned order dated 13.03.2019 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Railway, Samastipur in RPF(SMI) P.S. Case No. 15 of 2015 (CR No. 499 of 2015), whereby the learned Court has taken cognizance of the offences punishable under Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989 against the petitioner and others.

3. The brief facts giving rise to the present quashing application are that on 16.05.2015 the Central Intelligence Bureau (CIB) on a confidential information, keeping vigil over the Tatkal Railway Ticket Booking Counter. Suspecting some foul they entered in the booking cabin of the petitioner, where Station Superintendent, Station Master and others were present. In course of search, the CIB team recovered two tatkal tickets inside the counter but on calculating the cash, found that Rs.5,870/- was deficient as per cash summary. The p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document