Back
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA, MARLI VANKUNG
Laldingluaia – Appellant
Versus
State of Mizoram – Respondent
ORDER (ORAL)
Michael Zothankhuma, J.—Heard Mrs. Emily L. Chhangte, learned Amicus Curiae. Also heard Ms. Vanneihsiami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor and Mr. C. Tlanthianghlima, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the respondent No. 2.
2. The challenge made in this appeal is to the impugned Judgment & Order dated 25.07.2023 passed by the Court of Addl. District & Sessions Judge-cum- Judge Fast Track Court, Kolasib in Crl.Trl. No. 209/2022 (SR No. 13/2022), by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and vide Order dated 07.09.2023 sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 20 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/-, in default (i/d) of fine, to further undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 1 month.
3. The prosecution case in brief is that an FIR dated 23.12.2021 was submitted by the informant (PW-1), the mother of the victim, who stated that on the evening of 23.12.2021 at around 3:30 p.m, her 6 year old daughter visited the house of the appellant and came home with a frightened look on her face. On questioning her, her daughter told her that the appellant had inserted his private parts into her private parts and told her not to tell her mother about
Evidence of victim child cannot be sole basis for convicting accused unless safeguards are undertaken.
The trial court's failure to specify the charge under Section 4(1) or 4(2) of the POCSO Act resulted in an improper conviction and sentence, necessitating a remand for proper proceedings.
Penetrative sexual assault – Child witness - though the victim was only 4 years old at the time of the incident, a child witness can also be a reliable witness. In the present case, the competency of....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on the victim's testimony, medical evidence, and legal provisions from the POCSO Act to establish guilt under Section 6 and determine ....
The conviction under Section 6 of the POCSO Act was overturned due to discrepancies in the victim's testimony and lack of evidence proving the appellant's direct involvement in the alleged acts.
Conviction under POCSO Act modified from Section 6 to Section 10 due to evidentiary inconsistencies regarding penetration and charge alteration procedures impacting the defense.
The court upheld the conviction for aggravated penetrative sexual assault based on the victim's credible testimony, emphasizing that minor discrepancies do not undermine the overall reliability of he....
The act of touching a child's private parts through clothing does not constitute aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act, necessitating careful scrutiny of child witness testimony.
The testimony of a child victim is sufficient for conviction in sexual assault cases if credible, even amidst minor discrepancies and delays in FIR filing.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
