Back
R. G. AVACHAT, NEERAJ P. DHOTE
Surjitsingh Bhagatsingh Gambhir – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.G. Avachat, J.—This is an appeal under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (‘MCOCA’). The challenge in this appeal is to an order dated 18th January, 2023 passed by the Special Court, Ahmednagar, in Special Case No. 570 of 2020, refusing to grant the appellant discharge from the case.
2. The facts in brief, giving rise to the present appeal, are as follows:-
The elections for the memberships of Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar were held in February 2017. One Bhagyashree Mokate and Mangal Avhad were in the fray on behalf of a political part, “Shivsena”. Both the candidates held a party (wining and dining) for their followers on 12th February, 2017. The liquor served in the said party was found to have been spurious. As a result thereof, nine persons lost their lives and thirteen suffered grievous injuries. A crime vide C.R. No. 31 of 2017 was, therefore, registered with MIDC Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 304 and 328 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (‘I.P.C.’). During investigation, it was revealed that co-accused viz. Mohan Duggal, Jagjit Singh Gambhir and Zakir Shaikh would run the Civil Hospital Canteen
Abetment of organised crime syndicate – Act of appellant in subletting canteen premises in no way could be termed to be an act of abetment of organised crime syndicate.
Unlawful activity - If a person may or may not have any direct role to play as regards commission of an organized crime, if a nexus either with an accused who is a member of an “organized crime syndi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to strictly construe the provisions of MCOCA, establish the mens rea, and consider the length of the period spent in custody and the unlik....
The court affirmed that involvement in an organized crime syndicate justifies stringent bail denials, emphasized by the presence of multiple charges and confessions from co-accused.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the offence of organized crime under the MCOC Act requires involvement in substantive crimes, and mere continuing unlawful activity is not ....
(1) Interpretation of Statute – Rule of strict construction cannot be applied in an impracticable manner so as to render the statute itself nugatory.(2) Organised crime – Any person who is declared a....
The main legal point established is the requirement to establish a prima facie nexus between past crimes and the present crime to invoke the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act.
The prosecution under the M.C.O.C. Act requires that the necessary ingredients, including prior cognizance in multiple cases, must be satisfied at the time of the commission of the offence.
The judgment clarified the standards for proving membership in an organized crime syndicate and the necessity of demonstrating continuing unlawful activity under MCOCA.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
