SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CHITTARANJAN DASH
Hari Shankar Patnaik – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. D.K. Mohapatra, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties: Mr. A.K. Apat, ASC

JUDGMENT

Chittaranjan Dash, J.—By means of this application, the Petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court praying to quash the judgment dated 27.07.2024 passed in Criminal Revision No.5/01 of 2024 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sundargarh wherein the learned court confirmed the order dated 01.05.2024 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Sundargarh in G.R. Case No.696 of 2015.

2. The background facts of the case are that Opposite Party No. 2, i.e., the Branch Manager of Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., filed a complaint before the learned S.D.J.M., Sundargarh, registered as 1CC No. 126 of 2015, praying for cognizance to be taken under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., and for a direction to the police to register an FIR and investigate the matter. The learned S.D.J.M., Sundargarh, pursuant to the said complaint, directed the Town P.S., Sundargarh, to register the FIR and conduct an investigation. Accordingly, the IIC, Town P.S., registered the FIR, took up the investigation, and upon its completion, submitted the charge sheet against the Petitioner and another, implicating them in offences under Sections 406/420/201/34 IPC.

3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner, while assailing the impugne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top