GITA GOPI
Bhavsing Chhaganbhai Bilval Police Sub Inspector Since Deceased Through his Legal Heirs – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
The trial of custodial death was against seven accused, in Sessions Case no.37 of 1990 before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhavnagar Camp, Mahuva. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhavnagar on 30.11.2000 convicted accused no.1-Bhavsingbhai Chhaganbhai Bilval, PSI, Savarkundla Town Police Station for the offence under Section 304-II of IPC, sentencing him to seven years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.15,000/- with the default clause on nonpayment, to further suffer one year simple imprisonment.
1.1 For the offence under Section 330 IPC, accused no.1 was sentenced for three years rigorous imprisonment and Rs.10,000/- fine, in default of payment of fine, six months simple imprisonment.
1.2 Both the sentences to run concurrently. The benefit of set off under Section 428 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) was granted. The amount of compensation of Rs.25,000/- was ordered to be given to the legal heirs of the victim, deceased Kanudo @ Bhoplo Vallabhbhana Waghri of Maninagar Vaghrivas, Savarkundla.
1.3 Aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction, accused no.1 as appellant filed the present Criminal Appeal no.1138 of 2000 under Section 374(
Govindbhai Adherabhai Katara v. State of Gujarat
Balaji Gunthu Dhule v. State of Maharashtra
State of Gujarat v. Khatubhai Limbabhai Pagi and Ors.
Brathi @ Sukhdev Singh v. State of Punjab
State of M.P. v. Shyamsunder Trivedi
State of U.P. v. Ram Sagar Yadav
State of Rajasthan v. Thakur Singh
Madhu v. State of Karnataka (2014) 12 SCC 419. (Para 24) – Relied.
Jasdeep Singh v. State of Punjab (2022) 2 SCC 545 (Para 51) – Relied.
Virendra Singh v. State of M.P.
Premchand v. State of Maharashtra
State of M.P. v. Shyamsundar Trivedi & Ors.
Haricharan v. State of M.P. (2011) 4 SCC 159 (Para 86) – Relied.
State of Rajasthan v. Thakur Singh
People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. State of Maharashtra
Krishnamurty @ Gunodu and Ors. v. State of Karnataka
Afrahim Sheikh & Ors. v. State of West Bengal
Brathi @ Sukhdev Singh v. State of Punjab
State of M.P. v. Shyamsunder Trivedi (1995) 4 SCC 262 (Para 101) – Relied.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.