Ramesh Kumar Mundiwal VS State of Rajasthan through the Public Prosecutor

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Ramesh Kumar Mundiwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan through the Public Prosecutor – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Manish Gupta, Mr. Mukul Sharma, Ms. Sweta Soni (in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6039/2024)
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Ashish Kumar Gill for Ms. Sonia Gill (in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6476/2025)
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Harendra Singh, Mr. Majhar Hussain, Mr. Sitivam Sharma, Mr. Mayank Singhal, Ms. Soniya Saini (S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6594/2025)
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Praveen Balwada, Mr. Mohit Balwada, Mr. Sunil Singh Shekhawat (in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7193/2025)
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Deepak Chauhan, Mr. Hitanshu Joshi, Mr. Satya Pal Poshwal, Ms. Abhilasha Choudhary, Ms. Bhanwari Kumari, Ms. Arti Sharma and Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP

ORDER

The bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS are filed by the accused Umesh Kumar (S/o Lokesh Kumar), Ravindra @ Lodiya @ Sonu Kumar (S/o Ranveer Singh), Pradeep Kumar Mangawa (S/o Ranveer Singh), and Ramesh Kumar Mundiwal (S/o Dayanand) seeking bail in FIR No.204/2022 dated 10.9.2022 at P.S. Bagad, Jhunjhunu, for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, and 302 IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the applicants-accused submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against them is complete and they are no more required in investigation. They further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicants-accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. They also submits that the applicants undertake not to repeat offence and cooperate in trial, which will take time.

3. Learned counsels appearing on behalf of applicants submit that it is a case of accident and same was given color a premeditated assault. They further submits that few hours after the accident, a well-planned report was registered by complainant Mahendra Singh wherein he introduced Sanjeev as an eye-witness. He further submits that in the report itself, the complaina

Click Here to Read the rest of this document