Back
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Juvenile ‘X' – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for State.
2.This criminal revision has been preferred for setting aside judgment dated 24.02.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Godda, in Criminal Appeal No. 03 of 2025 whereby the learned court has been pleased to reject the criminal appeal and has affirmed the order dated 27.01.2025 passed by learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Godda in connection with Poraiyahat P.S. Case No.154 of 2024, arising out of Enquiry No.185 of 2024 inM.C.A. No.124 of 2025, registered under sections 309(4) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 25(1-b)a and 26 of Arms Act, pending in the Court of learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Godda.
3.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in remand since 31.12.2024 and was aged about 18 years at the time of alleged crime and the petitioner is being represented through his father. He next submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. He also submits that the father of the petitioner is ready to undertakes to keep the petitioner in good behaviour and character in future and will prevent him from associating with any
Bail to juvenile – Bail to juvenile is a rule and refusal of same is an exception – Seriousness of alleged offence is not a relevant consideration for denial of bail to juvenile – No society can affo....
Bail to juveniles under JJ Act Section 12 is rule; denial only on three specific grounds, not offence seriousness or age, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
