Back
P. M. RAVAL
Minor Yogesh Bhai Dinesh Bhai Sareriya – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER (ORAL)
Pursuant to service of notice of Rule upon respondent No. 2 –original complainant, learned advocate Mr. Bhaumik Dholariya appears on his behalf. He shall file his appearance before the registry, if yet not filed, which the registry shall accept.
2. This application has been filed by the juvenile in conflict with law through his father as a guardian under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (JJ Act) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11211050250380 of 2025, registered with Thangadh Police Station, District: Surendranagar for the offences punishable under Sections 63(A), 64(1)(2) (i)(m), 78(1)(i), 79, 351(2) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and Sections 3(A), 5(L), 6, 12, 16 and 17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act).
3. Heard, the learned advocates for the respective parties.
3.1 The learned advocate for the applicant submits that it is a case of love affair wherein the accused as well as the victim girl both are juvenile. She fairly conceded that the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) as well as the first Appellate Court, both have rejected the bail applicati
Bail – Bail to juvenile delinquent is a rule.
Juveniles are entitled to bail under Section 12 of the JJ Act unless there are compelling reasons to deny it, including assessments of their mental capacity.
Juveniles are entitled to bail under the Juvenile Justice Act unless there are compelling reasons to deny it, regardless of the offense's severity.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
