SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2423

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
Dheeraj Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Revision Petition No. 20 of 2021
Decided On : 19-02-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mrs.Aruna Negi, Advocate, Mr. Himmat Jagga, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP, for the Respondent.

Juveniles are entitled to bail under the Juvenile Justice Act unless there are compelling reasons to deny it, regardless of the offense's severity.

Headnote:

Bail - Juvenile Justice - Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 - Section 12 - The court emphasized that bail for juveniles should be granted unless there are reasonable grounds to believe that release would endanger them or defeat justice.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a juvenile, was denied bail under the Juvenile Justice Act due to allegations of serious offenses. The petitioner challenged the lower court's decisions rejecting his bail application.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the lower courts did not properly apply the provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act, particularly Section 12, which mandates bail for juveniles unless specific conditions are met.

Issues: Whether the denial of bail to the juvenile petitioner was justified under the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the gravity of the offense cannot be the sole reason to deny bail to a juvenile, and the statutory provisions favor the release of juveniles unless exceptional circumstances exist.

Result: The revision petition is allowed, and the orders denying bail are set aside.

ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner (juvenile- through his natural guardian father-Murali Lal) as well as learned Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is of offence under Sections 302, 147 & 149 IPC. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children). Act, 2015 before the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Sri Ganganagar was rejected vide order dated 14.12.2020. Being aggrieved by the said order, an appeal was filed by the petitioner before the learned Judge, Children Court (Sessions Judge), Sri Ganganagar and the same has been dismissed by learned Sessions Judge vide order dated 19.12.2020.

3. Being aggrieved of the orders dated 14.12.2020 and 19.12.2020 passed by the Courts below, the petitioner has preferred this revision petition before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no evidence to show that if the juvenile-petitioner is released on bail, then his release is likely to bring him into association with any known criminal, or expose them to moral, physical or psychological danger, or that his release would defeat the ends of justice. It is argued that learned Courts below have not appreciated the fact that the petitioner is juvenile and entitled to get benefit of provisions of the Act of 2015. Section 12 of the Act of 2015 clearly provides that if the accused is juvenile, then he should be released on bail, but learned Courts below fully ignored the provisions of the Act of 2015. The petitioner is in custody since long time and no further detention of the petitioner is required for any purpose. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the gravity of the offence committed cannot be a ground to decline bail to a juvenile.

5. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor defended the impugned order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board in declining the bail to the petitioner as also the judgment passed by the Appellate Court upholding the order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board.

6. I have carefully considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and also perused the provisions of the Act of 2015.

7. The language of Section 12 of the Act of 2015 conveys the intention of the Legislature to grant bail to the juvenile, irrespective of nature or gravity of the offence, alleged to have been committed by him and bail can be denied only in the case where there appears reasonable grounds for believing that the release is likely to bring him into association with any known criminal, or expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger, or that his release would defeat ends of justice.

8. In this context, I have also scanned through and perused the orders passed by the courts below.

9. Having carefully examined provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act vis-a-vis the orders passed by the courts below, I do not find that any of the exceptional circumstances, to decline bail to a juvenile, as indicated in Section 12 of the Act of 2015, is made out. Moreover, the challan of the case has already been presented and co-accused Naveen Kumar has also been released on bail.

10. In view of the aforesaid discussion, this revision petition is allowed and the order dated 14.12.2020 passed by the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Sri Ganganagar as well as order dated 19.12.2020 passed by learned Judge, Children Court (Sessions Judge), Sri Ganganagar declining bail to the petitioner is hereby set aside.

11. Accordingly, it is ordered that the juvenile accused-petitioner Dheeraj Kumar S/o Murari Lal shall be released on bail in FIR No.257/2020, P.S. Sadar, Distt. Sri Ganganagar upon furnishing personal bond by his natural guardian Murari Lal in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- each along with a surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Sri Ganganagar with the stip

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top