Back
H. P. SANDESH, VENKATESH NAIK T.
Irfan Nasir @ IRFI – Appellant
Versus
National Investigation Agency – Respondent
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
Venkatesh Naik T, J.—Heard the learned counsel for the appellant/accused No.3 and the learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent/NIA.
2. The appellant/accused No.3 has filed this appeal under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, to set aside the order dated 15.04.2025 passed by the learned 49th Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (Special Court for the Trial of NIA Cases), (CCH-50) at Bengaluru in Spl.C.C.No.595/2021 and R.C.No.33/2020/NIA/DLI and prayed to enlarge him on bail in the said Spl. C.C. No.595/2021.
3. The brief facts of the case is that, in connection with the said case, two accused persons were arrested on 08.03.2020 for their alleged affiliation with the banned terrorist organization, Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP). During the investigation, another accused, Abdur Rehman @ Dr.Brave was arrested on 17.03.2020. During his interrogation, he disclosed that he had traveled to Syria in the year 2013-14 along with Afroz Ahmed, allegedly funded by members of a group called “Quran Circle.” He further revealed that pro-ISIS activists were actively operating in Bengaluru, involved in identifying and radicalizing gu
(1) Bail – Successive bail applications are not barred per se, but they can be entertained only if there is a demonstrable change in circumstances since rejection of previous application.(2) Prior to....
The court established that under the UAPA, knowledge of a person's terrorist activities is crucial for liability under Section 19, and the restrictions on bail under Section 43D(5) apply when there a....
The judgment established that the continued detention of the appellant was in violation of his right to personal liberty, and he was entitled to bail considering the delay in trial and the gravity of....
The right to fair and speedy trial is recognized under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The High Court's decision reaffirms the principle that undertrials cannot be allowed to languish for ye....
Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record - Bail granted - Clause (b) of section 21(4) of MCOC Act it becomes evident that it contains an interdict against grant of bail unless Court sa....
(1) Statutory restriction like Section 43-D(5) of UAPA per se does not operate as an impediment on powers of Constitutional Court to grant bail, if a case of infringement of constitutional guarantee ....
Prolonged detention without trial infringes the right to life and liberty, allowing for bail despite statutory restrictions under UAPA.
Long pre-trial detention can justify bail despite statutory restrictions, emphasizing the constitutional right to a speedy trial.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
