SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NIKHIL S. KARIEL
Rakshit Ravish Chorasiya – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant(s) No. 1: Shaishav S Pandit (7363)
For the Respondent(s) No. 1.: Mr. Jay Mehta, Addl. Public Prosecutor

ORDER (ORAL)

Heard learned advocate Mr. Bhadrish Raju with learned advocate Mr. Shaishav Pandit appearing on behalf of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Jay Mehta appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

1.1. Learned advocate Mr. Moulesh A. Vyas submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the original complainant and that he may be permitted to file his Vakalatnama. Permission is granted.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11196027250115/2025 registered with Karelibaug Police Station, Vadodara City for the offence punishable under Sections 105, 281, 125(a), 125(b), 324(5), 54 of the BNS and Sections 134, 177, 184, 185 of the Motor Vehicle Act.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that since the chargesheet is filed no useful purpose wo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top