SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Guj) 94

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
NIKHIL S.KARIEL
Dilipbhai Jayantibhai Mehta – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Aniq A. Kadri
For the Respondent: Ronak Raval

ORDER :

1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr.I.H.Syed for learned advocate Mr.Aniq Kadri appearing on behalf of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.Ronak Raval appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11210048210445/2021 registered with Umra Police Station, Surat for the offence punishable under Sections 406 , 420, 409, 114 of the IPC .

3.1. The applicant having been arraigned as an accused in connection with the aforementioned offence, had approached this Court for being released on regular bail and whereas, the learned Coordinate Bench vide order dated 06.08.2021 in Criminal Misc. Application No.11190/2021 had directed the release of the present applicant more particularly upon condition that the applicant would deposit an amount of Rs.45,00,000/- before the learned Sessions Court within a period of two months.

3.2. It would appear that the applicant could not comply with the said condition fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top