SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Pat) 151

K.DAYAL, CHOUDHARY
Mohammad Abdur Razaque – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Majid – Respondent


Judgment

Choudhary, J.

1. This appeal is by defendant No. 2. The facts leading to the presentation of the appeal stated shortly, are these. There is a sugar mill fn Siwan known as Indian Sugar Works, Siwan. A title suit, being title suit No. 33 of 1943, was filed by three plaintiffs, named Abdul Mazid, Mohammad Hadi and Lutf Ahmad, against Abdul Razak for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts with respect to the said mill. Lutf Ahmad, plaintiff No. 3 of that suit, was appointed receiver and he leased out the mill to one Nasir Ahmad at Rs. 2,10,100 rental per season,

A money suit, No. 28 of 1948, out of which the present appeal arises was thereafter filed by four plaintiffs, namely, the Indian Sugar Works, Lutf Ahmad, Abdul Mazid & Mohammad Hadi, against Nasir Ahmad, the lessee, and Abdul Razak alleged to be the manager of the Indian Sugar Works, for recovery of the lease rent and certain other amounts totalling Rs. 2,89,944-10-6. The two defendants filed two separate written statements. The Plea of defendant No. 2, so far as is relevant for the purpose of the present appeal was that Abdul Mazid, plaintiff No. 3 of this suit and plaintiff No. 1 of the above title suit,
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top