PATNA HIGH COURT
V.Ramaswami and N.L.Untwalia JJ.
Patna Zilla Truck Owners Association
Versus
State Of Bihar
Miscellaneous Judicial Case No. 767 of 1961 ; 916 of 1961 ; 918 of 1961 ; 1000 of 1961 ; 1069 of 1961 ; 1071 of 1961 ; 1085 of 1961 ;
Decided On : SEPTEMBER 05, 1962
TAXATION - Bihar Taxation on Passengers and Goods (carried by Public Service Motor Vehicles) Act, 1961 (Bihar Act XVII of 1961) - Constitutionality - Whether the provisions of the Act are constitutionally valid and operative - Whether the Act violates the freedom of trade and commerce guaranteed under Article 301 of the Constitution - Whether the restrictions imposed by the Act are reasonable restrictions within the meaning of Article 304 (b) of the Constitution - Whether the Act is saved by the compliance of the provisions of Article 304 (b) of the Constitution.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of the Bihar Taxation on Passengers and Goods (carried by Public Service Motor Vehicles) Act, 1961 (Bihar Act XVII of 1961), contending that it violated the freedom of trade and commerce guaranteed under Article 301 of the Constitution and that the restrictions imposed by the Act were not reasonable restrictions within the meaning of Article 304 (b) of the Constitution.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the provisions of the Bihar Taxation on Passengers and Goods (carried by Public Service Motor Vehicles) Act, 1961 (Bihar Act XVII of 1961) were constitutionally valid and operative. The Court held that the Act did not violate the freedom of trade and commerce guaranteed under Article 301 of the Constitution and that the restrictions imposed by the Act were reasonable restrictions within the meaning of Article 304 (b) of the Constitution. The Court also held that the Act was saved by the compliance of the provisions of Article 304 (b) of the Constitution.
Issues: 1. Whether the provisions of the Bihar Taxation on Passengers and Goods (carried by Public Service Motor Vehicles) Act, 1961 (Bihar Act XVII of 1961) are constitutionally valid and operative? 2. Whether the Act violates the freedom of trade and commerce guaranteed under Article 301 of the Constitution? 3. Whether the restrictions imposed by the Act are reasonable restrictions within the meaning of Article 304 (b) of the Constitution? 4. Whether the Act is saved by the compliance of the provisions of Article 304 (b) of the Constitution?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The freedom of trade and commerce guaranteed by Article 301 of the Constitution is wider than that contained in Sec.297 of the Government of India Act, 1935, and it includes freedom from tax laws also. 2. The provisions of the Bihar Taxation on Passengers and Goods (carried by Public Service Motor Vehicles) Act, 1961 (Bihar Act XVII of 1961) directly violate the freedom of trade and commerce contemplated by Article 301 of the Constitution. 3. The restrictions imposed by the Bihar Taxation on Passengers and Goods (carried by Public Service Motor Vehicles) Act, 1961 (Bihar Act XVII of 1961) are reasonable restrictions within the meaning of Article 304 (b) of the Constitution. 4. The Bihar Taxation on Passengers and Goods (carried by Public Service Motor Vehicles) Act, 1961 (Bihar Act XVII of 1961) is saved by the compliance of the provisions of Article 304 (b) of the Constitution.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Bihar Taxation on Passengers and Goods (carried by Public Service Motor Vehicles) Act, 1961 (Bihar Act XVII of 1961).
Ramaswami, J.
1. In all these cases, which have been heard together a common question of law arises for determination, namely, whether the provisions of the Bihar Taxation on Passengers and Goods (carried by Public Service Motor Vehicles) Act, 1961 (Bihar Act XVII of 1961), are constitutionally valid and operative.
2. On the 30th March, 1950, the Bihar Legislature enacted the Bihar Finance Act, 1950, (Bihar Act XVII of 1950) by which a tax was levied on passengers and goods carried by public service motor vehicles in Bihar. The Act received the assent of the President on the 1st April, 1950. The validity of the Act was challenged by the petitioners in Title Suit No. 60 of 1951, which was instituted on the 5th May, 1951, in the Court of the 1st Subordinate Judge of Gaya. The petitioners prayed in that suit for a declaration that the provisions of Part III of the Bihar Finance Act, 1950 , were unconstitutional, and for a permanent injunction restraining the State of Bihar from levying and realising the tax. A similar suit was instituted, namely, Title Suit No. 47 of 1951, on behalf of passengers and owners of goods for similar reliefs. Both these title suits were transfer-ed to the Patna High Court for hearing, and on The 8th May, 1952, the title suits were dismissed by a Special Bench on the ground that the provisions of Part III of the Bihar Finance Act, 1950 , did not contravene Article 301 of the Constitution and the previous sanction of the President was not required for enacting such a law.
The petitioners presented an appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment of the High Court, namely, Supreme Court Appeal No. 53 of 1952. On the 12th December, 1960, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that. Part III of the Bihar Finance Act, 1950 , violated the constitutional guarantee under Article 301 of the Constitution and the petitioners were entitled to a declaration to that effect and to a permanent injunction restraining the State of Bihar from charging or realising tax imposed under that Act. The judgment of the Supreme Court was based upon its previous decision in Atiabari Tea Co., Ltd. V/s. State of Assam, (1961) 1 SCR 809 : (AIR 1961 SC 232) where a similar point was dealt with. It was held by the Supreme Court that as the previous sanction of the President was not taken, as required under the proviso to Article 304 of the Constitution, the Act was ultra vires and invalid.
After the decision of the Supreme Court the Government of Bihar promulgated Bihar Ordinance No. 11 of 1961 on the 1st of August, 1961. The Ordinance was called the Bihar Taxation on Passengers and Goods (carried by Public Service Motor Vehicles) Ordinance, 1961. Sec.1, Sub-Section (3) of the Ordinance provides that "it shall be deemed to have come into force on the first day of April, 1950". The provisions of the Ordinance were subsequently incorporated in Bihar Act-XVII of 1961 which received the assent of the President on the 23rd September, 1961. It should be stated that the previous sanction of the President was obtained before Bihar Act XVII of 1961 was introduced in the Bihar Legislature.
3. It is necessary at this stage to set out the relevant provisions of the impugned statute. The title of the Act is "The Bihar Taxation on Passengers and Goods (carried by Public Service Motor Vehicles) Act, 1961." Sec.1, Sub-section (2) of the Act states that "it extends to the whole of the State of Bihar". Sec.1 (3) of the Act provides that "it shall be deemed to have come into force of the first day of April, 1950". Sec.3 imposes the charge and rate of tax and reads as follows :-
-
"3. Charge and rate of tax. -- (1) On and from the date on which this Act is deemed to have come into force under Sub-section (3) of Sec.1, there shall be levied and paid to the State Government a tax on all passengers and goods carried by a public service motor vehicle; such tax shall be levied and paid at the rate of twelve and a half per centum of the fares a
Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd. V/s. State Of Assam
Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. V/s. State Of Rajasthan
Chhotabhai Jethabhai And Co. V/s. Union Of India
M.S.M. Sharma V/s. Dr. Shree Krishna Sinha
Profulla Chandra V/s. Prabartak Trust
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.