SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Pat) 153

S.N.P.SINGH, N.L.UNTWALIA
Baij Nath Kedia – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

N.L.Untwalia, J.

1. The facts of these two cases and the points involved in them are similar and identical. They have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment. I shall state the point urged with reference to the facts of C. W. J. C. 1036 of 1965 and after disposing them of shall refer to the facts of the other case, viz., C.W.J.C. 686 of 1965.

2. The petitioners case is that Shri Jyoti Prakash Pandey obtained a right of quarrying and getting stone ballasts, boulders and chips from and upon block nos. 32. 45/1, 45/2 and 45/3 having a total area of 12 bighas 2 Kathas 10 dhurs in tauzi No. 1452 khata No. 1 situated in Mauza Malpahari No. 89 in the subdivision of Pakur, district Santhal Parganas, from Shrimati Anila Debi for self and as legatee under a Will of late Baidyanath Pandey and Babu Bijan Kumar Pandey, that is to say from the ex-landlords, for a period of thirty years commencing from the 1st November 1954, and ending on the 31st October, 1984 under a registered lease dated 23-3-55, a copy whereof is annexed and marked annexure A to the writ application. After the vesting of the estate in the State of Bihar, the State became the lessor for the

























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top