S.N.P.SINGH, N.L.UNTWALIA
Baij Nath Kedia – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
N.L.Untwalia, J.
1. The facts of these two cases and the points involved in them are similar and identical. They have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment. I shall state the point urged with reference to the facts of C. W. J. C. 1036 of 1965 and after disposing them of shall refer to the facts of the other case, viz., C.W.J.C. 686 of 1965.
2. The petitioners case is that Shri Jyoti Prakash Pandey obtained a right of quarrying and getting stone ballasts, boulders and chips from and upon block nos. 32. 45/1, 45/2 and 45/3 having a total area of 12 bighas 2 Kathas 10 dhurs in tauzi No. 1452 khata No. 1 situated in Mauza Malpahari No. 89 in the subdivision of Pakur, district Santhal Parganas, from Shrimati Anila Debi for self and as legatee under a Will of late Baidyanath Pandey and Babu Bijan Kumar Pandey, that is to say from the ex-landlords, for a period of thirty years commencing from the 1st November 1954, and ending on the 31st October, 1984 under a registered lease dated 23-3-55, a copy whereof is annexed and marked annexure A to the writ application. After the vesting of the estate in the State of Bihar, the State became the lessor for the
Hingir Rampur Coal Co. Ltd. V/s. State Of Orissa
Jagannath Baksh Singh V/s. United Provinces
Prafulla Kumar Mukherjee V/s. Bank Of Commerce Ltd., Khulna
Sethi Marble Stones Industries V/s. State Of Rajasthan
State Of Bihar V/s. Kameshwar Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.