SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Pat) 12

K.B.N.SINGH, TARKESHWAR NATH, N.L.UNTWALIA
Sarjug Singh – Appellant
Versus
Basisth Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Untwalia, J.

1. All these three miscellaneous appeals referred to Full Bench have been heard together as the common question of law involved in them is whether dismissal of a judgment-debtors application u/s. 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure hereinafter called the Code in his default is a bar to the maintainability of an identical or a similar application by the judgment-debtor on the principles of res judicata.

2. By order dated 13th of April, 1967 R.K. Choudhary and G.N. Prasad, JJ., referred miscellaneous appeal 175 of 1962 to a larger Bench as in respect of the point aforesaid there was a conflict of views expressed in two Bench decisions of this Court, namely, Ramnarain Singh V/s. Basudeo Singh, AIR 1947 Pat 298 and Bhagwati Prasad Sah V/s. Radha Kisun Sah, AIR 1950 Pat 354. Since this was an appeal from an original order, obviously the reference was under Rule 3, Chapter V of the Patna High Court Rules, and only the questions of law could be referred. No question for answer by the Full Bench was, however, framed by the Division Bench. Miscellaneous Appeal 248 of 1964 which is an appeal from an appellate order, in view of the earlier reference to the Full Bench in mis

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top