SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Pat) 119

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, R.N.PRASAD, M.P.VARMA
Ramesh Kumar Ravi Alias Ram Prasad And Etc. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, J.

1. The larger questions of criminal jurisprudence which loom for adjudication in these connected writ jurisdiction cases may well be precisely formulated in the terms following :

(i) Whether a Magistrate has no jurisdiction to pass an order of remand unless an application or a request to that effect is made by the Police or the prosecution ?

(ii) Whether the physical production of the accused before the Magistrate for the purpose of remand is so mandatory that a failure to do so would vitiate the same even if the circumstances for non-production were beyond the control of the prosecution and the Police ?

(iii) Whether a defect or illegality in the order of a remand of an accused person is incurable and he can claim a writ of habeas corpus despite the fact that on the date of hearing he is in custody under a valid order of remand ?

(iv) Whether the judicial orders of a Criminal Court (stricto sensu) under the Code of Criminal Procedure, are amenable to quashing by a writ of certiorari ?

2. The facts giving rise to the pristinely legal questions aforesaid are not in serious dispute and lie in a narrow compass. The petitioner was arrested at dawn on the 9th















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top