B.N.AGRAWAL, J.

1. Defendant No. 6 has moved this Court by filing the present revision application against the impugned order by which the objections filed on behalf of defendants Nos. 1, 5 and 6 to the recording of compromise have been rejected, compromise has been found to be lawful and the suit was adjourned to another date for checking up the compromise petition and submission of report by the office.

2. The facts of the case in short are that the plaintiffs-opposite parties filed a suit for partition claiming half share in the suit property in which two sets of written statements were filed by the defendants. During the pendency of the suit, on 7/04/1982, a compromise petition purported to bear the signatures and left thumb impression of the parties was filed. Two objection petitions were filed to the recording of the compromise, one by defendant No. 1 and the other by defendants 5 and 6. According to defendant No. 1, his signature on the compromise petition was obtained by practising fraud upon him. According to defendants Nos. 5 and 6, they neither entered into the compromise nor put their left thumb impressions on the compromise petition. Since the genuineness of th